Solving Electric Field Zero: 0.20m Charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the point where the electric field between two charges, +1.5x10^-6C and +3.0x10^-6C, separated by 0.20m, equals zero. The user attempts to solve the equation derived from the electric field strengths of both charges but encounters discrepancies in their calculations. They arrive at incorrect solutions of -0.48m and 0.08m, while the textbook answer is 0.12m (1.2x10^-1m). The user seeks assistance in identifying the error in their mathematical approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric field calculations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts and superposition principle
  • Basic grasp of charge interactions and their effects on electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric field equations using Coulomb's Law
  • Practice solving quadratic equations related to electric fields
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their significance
  • Investigate the superposition principle in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone interested in mastering electric field calculations and problem-solving techniques.

jalen
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



+1.5x10^-6C, +3.0x10^-6C, 0.20m

Homework Equations



Two charges of +1.5x10^-6C and +3.0x10^-6C are 0.20m apart. Where is the electric field between them equal to zero?

The Attempt at a Solution



= (9.0x10^9)(1.5x10^-6C) + (9.0x10^9)(3.0x10^-6C)
x^2 (0.2-x)^2
1.5(0.2-x)^2=3.0(x^2)
(0.2-x)^2=2(x^2)
0.4-0.2x-0.2x+x^2=2x^2
-x^2-0.4+0.04=0

The answers you'll get are -0.48 and 0.08. The answer in the text is 1.2x10^-1m and you can get it if it's 0.06 instead of 0.04. I looked over my work but I can't find where I went wrong. =(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field strength due to Q1(at distance x from Q1)=The electric field strength due to Q2(at the distance of x from Q2)
 
Sorry, I don't really understand what you're trying to say. Can someone please tell me which line is incorrect so I can take a closer look and figure it out again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K