Solving Electrical Circuits: Find Voltage Vx

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the voltage Vx in an electrical circuit described by a voltage source Vs = V0*cos(wt), with given parameters including w, R, C, L, and V0. Participants explore various methods for solving the circuit, including Kirchhoff's Laws and simplifications involving impedances.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether using Kirchhoff's Laws (KVL and KCL) is the right approach to solve for Vx.
  • Another participant suggests that simplifying the circuit to fewer impedances could be beneficial.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of resonance in circuits involving capacitors and inductors, with one participant explaining how to determine resultant impedance in series and parallel configurations.
  • Participants discuss the complexity of the circuit and the potential for simplification based on the given data.
  • One participant concludes that if no current flows through a resistor Rx, then Vx must be zero, but this conclusion is not universally accepted as the final answer.
  • There is a light-hearted exchange about the spelling of "Kirchhoff" and the use of abbreviations, indicating a more informal aspect of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of Kirchhoff's Laws and the potential for circuit simplification, but there is no consensus on the final value of Vx, as some participants suggest it could be zero while others do not confirm this as a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about circuit configurations and the nature of resonance, which are not fully resolved. The complexity of the circuit and the specific numerical data provided are also noted as factors that could influence the approach to solving the problem.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in electrical engineering, particularly those working on circuit analysis and resonance phenomena.

erezb84
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to find the voltage Vx.
Vs = V0*cos(wt)
given: w,R,C,L,V0

I thought doing KVL,KCL but got stuck...
is this the way to solve this? is there another way?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • _1_~1.jpg
    _1_~1.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried Kirkoff's Laws?
 
This is what i wrote, i have tried KVL KCL but got stuck, is this the way or there is another "trick"?
 
It is the way and you can apply tricks only in special cases. What was the
problem in detail?

You can determine the resultant impedance when you see parallel or in-series elements. It can happen that a capacitor and an inductor make a resonant circuit. In this case the resultant impedance is infinite if they are connected parallel, and zero when they are in series. ehild
 
Last edited:
Can you please elaborate the last sentece...?
 
He's suggesting that you simplify the circuit to just a few impedences - like right nest to the Vx you have a cap and an inductor in parallel - you can combine their impedences to a single component.

Remember how you used to do this when it was just resistances?

I cannot tell how you tried to apply kirkoffs laws from what you wrote - KVL and KCL tells me nothing...

By brute-force you have something like 5 loops and 8 nodes. Since I don't know how you did your working I don't know where you got stuck ... if you don't say what you did you can only get the most general of answers.

There are only two ways of doing this sort of problem - Kirkoffs Laws, and simplifying the circuit to an equivalent with fewer impedences and then applying kirkoff.
 
Many thanks! I will try again!
 
Simon Bridge said:
There are only two ways of doing this sort of problem - Kirkoffs Laws, and simplifying the circuit to an equivalent with fewer impedences and then applying kirkoff.

"Kirkoff" is Kirchhoff. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Kirchhoff. And KCL, KVL mean Kirchhoff's circuit laws "Kirchhoff' Current Law"and "Kirchhoff's Voltage Law".

ehild
 
erezb84 said:
Can you please elaborate the last sentece...?

The impedance of a capacitor C and inductor L in series is Z=jωL+1/(jωc).
If LCω2=1 the impedance is zero, and you can substitute it with a short.
When a capacitor and inductor are connected in parallel, the impedance is jωL/(1-ω2LC) infinite, and can be omitted from the circuit.
The diagram is too complicated for a homework. I think the data are given is such way that some simplification is possible.

So what are the numerical data for the circuit?

ehild
 
  • #10
Thank for the explanation!
Indeed in my case w=1/sqrt(L3*C3)

So, Vx=0?
 
  • #11
erezb84 said:
Thank for the explanation!
Indeed in my case w=1/sqrt(L3*C3)

So, Vx=0?

As no current can flow through Rx, Vx = 0. It was simple, wasn't it?

ehild
 
  • #12
With your guidelines it was :)
 
  • #13
ehild said:
"Kirkoff" is Kirchhoff. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Kirchhoff. And KCL, KVL mean Kirchhoff's circuit laws "Kirchhoff' Current Law"and "Kirchhoff's Voltage Law".

ehild
Spelling is just not my thing! <sigh>
I should have realized what the TLAs meant you are right.
Good call on the resonance.
 
  • #14
Simon Bridge said:
Spelling is just not my thing! <sigh>
I should have realized what the TLAs meant you are right.
Good call on the resonance.

First I thought that you learned about Kirchhoff's Laws in Russian.

And what is TLA? (I hate abbreviations).

That circuit was so complicated that it had no sense without resonant parts.

ehild
 
  • #15
ehild said:
First I thought that you learned about Kirchhoff's Laws in Russian.
Nah - on Star Trek ... I learned the James Tiberius Kirk-off Laws :) (We come in peace - aside: set phasers on stun.)
And what is TLA? (I hate abbreviations).
You'll like this one - it's toungue-in-cheek when people use them too much. It means "Three Letter Acronym".
That circuit was so complicated that it had no sense without resonant parts.
I guess - I was being a bit cruel pushing K's laws (see how I cunningly avoid spelling, um, it?) ... but applying them to those little loops would have shown the same thing and pain is such a good teacher.

Of course, generating relief is good too.

I see we were told that w was given - just not what it was given as: which is probably what would have cued me in on it post #1.

Anyhoo - I enjoyed watching you work. Ta.
 
  • #16
Me too! Nice to learn some new and good intuitions...
 
  • #17
Simon Bridge said:
I was being a bit cruel pushing K's laws (see how I cunningly avoid spelling, um, it?)

Just use KCL and KVL as anybody else here...:wink:
Your post is a good lecture for me in Contemporary English - having read it about 10 times I still do not understand half of it. Ta.:smile:


@erezb84: I hate when a student starts to solve a problem with plugging in data, except AC circuits. For most of them, that is the best start. Plug in data, evaluate, simplify.

ehild
 
  • #18
Oh that's annoying ... oh well, as long as it was fun.
(pm me if you don't figure it out.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K