Solving Emergency Problem Involving Rod Rotating Around Z Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
There is a rod rotating around the z axis with angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex].The angle between the rod and z axis is constant and equal to [itex]\alpha[/itex].A mass m is constrained to move on the rod.The gravitational force is in the negative direction of z axis and the friction between the mass and rod is negligible.At time t=0 , the mass is at distance [itex]r_{0}[/itex] from the origin and is stationary relative to rod.

1-In a proper coordinate system,write the Newton's second law for the mass in a inertial frame of reference and write the differential equations of motion.Highlight the expressions indicating the reaction of rod.

2-Solve the differential equations and write the mass's distance from origin as a function of time.

3-Calculate the reaction force of the rod(direction and magnitude)


thanks
 
on Phys.org
Does the following get you started?
 

Attachments

  • aaaaa103.jpg
    aaaaa103.jpg
    15.1 KB · Views: 434
Thanks a lot.My mistake was that I didn't write N but only the centripetal force.

But it seems sth is wrong there.Just imagine such a thing not rotating.you know that the mass slides down.So it seems that [itex]N \sin {\alpha}[/itex] is not equal to mg.
Another question.
Last night I worked on it and got some things but there is a big puzzle in my mind.
Textbooks say that the acceleration in spherical coordinates is as following:

[itex]\textbf{a}=(\ddot{r} - r \dot{\phi}^{2} \sin ^ {2} \theta -r \dot{\theta}^{2}) \hat{e_{r}} +[/itex] [itex]( r \ddot{\theta} + 2 \dot{r} \dot{\theta} - r \dot{\phi} ^ {2} \sin {\theta} \cos{\theta}) \hat{e_{\theta}} +[/itex] [itex](r \ddot{\phi} \sin{\theta} + 2 \dot {r} \dot {\phi} \sin {\theta} + 2 r \dot{\theta} \dot{\phi} \cos{\theta}) \hat{e_{\phi}}[/itex]

Shoud I use the r coordinate of the above equation for writing Newton's 2nd law or simply write [itex]m \ddot{r}[/itex] ?
I tried both.When I use the equation above I get crazy things.But when I use [itex]m \ddot{r}[/itex] I get a cosine.
I'm just wondering that the above equation is the most general and can't understand why it becomes wrong in this problem.

The last question.
The [itex]\theta[/itex] coordinate of the acceleration should be zero.But when I write the Newton's 2nd law in that coordinate and replace [itex]\ddot{\theta}[/itex] with zero,I get r=constant,which is clearly wrong.Could you write that?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Do you know what i said?
 

Attachments

  • untitled5.jpg
    untitled5.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 381

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K