Solving Equations: How to Find the Solution for (4/3)x^3 + x^2 - 2x + 8/3 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter kd001
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the cubic equation (4/3)x^3 + x^2 - 2x + 8/3 = 0. Participants explore methods for finding the roots of this polynomial, noting that traditional techniques like the quadratic formula are not applicable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest multiplying by a constant to simplify the leading term and discuss the rational roots theorem as a potential approach. There are mentions of Cardano's formula and the Newton-Raphson method for approximating roots.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on methods to explore, while others express uncertainty about their familiarity with the suggested techniques. Multiple approaches are being considered, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method to pursue.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that this is a practice problem rather than a formal homework assignment, which may influence the depth of exploration and the methods discussed.

kd001
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't really homework. I've just been practicing some equations and I'm stuck at the one below.


Homework Equations


(4/3)x^3 + x^2 - 2x + 8/3 = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


The quadratic formula does not apply to this so how do I solve it for x?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing I would do is multiply both sides by 3/4 to get rid of the ugly leading term. Then try using the rational roots theorem. In short, if there is a rational root for your polynomial, then it is given by a factor of the coefficient of x0 over a factor of the coefficient of x3. This will hopefully give you a very short list to try. If none of those work, then the polynomial has no rational roots and you have to use more advanced methods. If it does work, you can use long division to get the rest of the roots, if any.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the quick reply. I'll try that although its not something I'm familiar with.
 
kd001 said:
Thanks for the quick reply. I'll try that although its not something I'm familiar with.

For cubics, there is always Cardano's formula, but it is rather messy in that it can give complicated complex expressions for simple real roots. The rational root method is often faster and less time consuming.
Otherwise, as you are posting in the calculus forum, you can use Newton-Raphson to approximate a root if there are no rational roots.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K