Solving Exercise: Find Thickness of Rubber Insulation for Copper Wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the thickness of rubber insulation required for a copper wire with a diameter of 2mm and a length of 100m, which carries a current of 80A. The electrical resistance of the wire is 0.5 mΩ/m, and the thermal conductivity of rubber is 0.15 W/mK. The participants analyze the heat transfer equations, specifically using the formula ln(r2/r1) = (2πLkΔT)/q, to determine the insulation thickness necessary to maintain a maximum temperature of 70°C in the rubber layer. Several participants highlight the importance of unit consistency and the potential for arithmetic errors in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal resistance and heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with electrical resistance calculations
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their application in engineering
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of heat transfer in insulating materials
  • Learn about the calculation of thermal resistance in layered materials
  • Study the effects of current carrying capacity (ampacity) on wire insulation
  • Explore the relationship between electrical resistance and temperature changes in conductors
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, thermal management specialists, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of insulated electrical conductors will benefit from this discussion.

Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Good day all, I tried to solve the following exercise, I would be glad to get feedback for my attempt ( indeed I was puzzled by the numerical solution I got just need to check it for any mistake:

A copper wire , 2mm in diameter and 100 m in length has an electrical resistance of 0,5 mΩ/m, the wire carries a current of 80 A and is insulated by using a layer of rubber kr=0,15W/mK
determine the thickness of the rubber needed to prevent the maximum temperature in the insulating layer from exceeding 70 °C and the rubber outer surface 40 °C.

My attempt
lets calculate the heat rate q:
q=Relectrical*I2
lets calulate the Resitance of rubber
Rrubber=ln(r2/r1)/(2πLk)

ΔT =Rrubber*qRrubber=ΔT/q
SO
ln(r2/r1)=2πLk*ΔT*q
SO

r2/r1=exp(2πLk*ΔT*q)
which means
r2=r1*exp(2πLk*ΔT*q)


any feed back would be highly appreciated!
thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure about the current?
 
This is confusing. Try writing the answer in terms of symbols first, then put in the numbers at the very end. I suspect there is an error in unit conversion somewhere. Also, please use symbol R to denote either electrical or thermal resistance but not both.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
Chestermiller said:
Are you sure about the current?
thanks for your prompt answer! yes I'm pretty sure about it, but what about my approach is it correct?
 
kuruman said:
This is confusing. Try writing the answer in terms of symbols first, then put in the numbers at the very end. I suspect there is an error in unit conversion somewhere. Also, please use symbol R to denote either electrical or thermal resistance but not both.
thanks a lot for your interest
I tried to arrange the presentation
 
Amaelle said:
thanks for your prompt answer! yes I'm pretty sure about it, but what about my approach is it correct?
In my judgment, if you did the arithmetic right (including units), your approach is correct.

Did they say anything about an external convective heat transfer resistance between the outer surface and the bulk room air?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
no nothing ! I have reported the exercice as it is
 
ln(r2/r1)=2πLk*ΔT*q

The q should be in the denominator
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
Chestermiller said:
ln(r2/r1)=2πLk*ΔT*q

The q should be in the denominator
Yes thank you you are right it was a tipo , but i got still the same awkward numerical results,
Thanks a million for you constructive feedback, you are awsome as always!
 
  • #10
Amaelle said:
Yes thank you you are right it was a tipo , but i got still the same awkward numerical results,
Thanks a million for you constructive feedback, you are awsome as always!
I did not get the same numeral results when I did the calculation.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
I did not get the same numeral results when I did the calculation.
ln(r2/r1)=(2πLk*ΔT)q

q=R*I2=320W
ln(r2/r1)=(2π*100*0,15*30)/320=8,83125
r2=r1exp(8,83125)=6844,83 mm
is that wrong?
 
  • #12
Amaelle said:
ln(r2/r1)=(2πLk*ΔT)q

q=R*I2=320W
ln(r2/r1)=(2π*100*0,15*30)/320=8,83125
r2=r1exp(8,83125)=6844,83 mm
is that wrong?
I must have made a mistake in arithmetic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
  • #13
Chestermiller said:
I must have made a mistake in arithmetic.
oh thanks and i wanted to write ln(r2/r1)=(2πLk*ΔT)/q as you pointed out earlier!
thanks a lot!
 
  • #14
If we shall neglect the temperature drop from surface to air and the resistance increased due temperature it is correct.
Actually, 0.5 ohm will be the resistance of this wire at -2oC and at 70oC it will be 0.6566 ohm.
The surface to air thermal resistance is very high so for 6 mm insulation thickness it will be a minimum wire temperature of 201.15 oC.
That is why Chestermiller ask you if you are sure 80 A is the current.
Usually the thickness of insulation is 0.8 mm and the current carrying capacity [ampacity] will be 32 A
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
  • #15
Babadag said:
If we shall neglect the temperature drop from surface to air and the resistance increased due temperature it is correct.
Actually, 0.5 ohm will be the resistance of this wire at -2oC and at 70oC it will be 0.6566 ohm.
The surface to air thermal resistance is very high so for 6 mm insulation thickness it will be a minimum wire temperature of 201.15 oC.
That is why Chestermiller ask you if you are sure 80 A is the current.
Usually the thickness of insulation is 0.8 mm and the current carrying capacity [ampacity] will be 32 A
I
Ok then I see :) thanks a lot for your insights!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K