Solving for ΔP: Should I Include ΔVΔI?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyouran
  • Start date Start date
Kyouran
Messages
70
Reaction score
10
Hey all,

I have a question that's been annoying me for a little while:

if i have

<br /> P_0 = V_0 I_0<br />

(power equals current times the potential difference) then is

<br /> P_0 + \Delta P= V_0 I_0 + V_0 \Delta I + I_0 \Delta V + \Delta V \Delta I<br />

correct or should it be

<br /> P_0 + \Delta P= V_0 I_0 + V_0 \Delta I + I_0 \Delta V<br />

In other words, if I use ΔP should I include the term ΔVΔI or not? After all, when I use differentials, i get

<br /> \frac{dP}{dt} = V_0 \frac{dI}{dt} + I_0 \frac{dV}{dt}<br />

But when I look at what is meant by "ΔP", it is stated as "the change in delta P", which includes more terms than just the first order ones? What is exactly meant by Δ? Just the first order variation, or all orders of variations?

Thanks in advance,


Kyouran
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The product of the two differences can be taken to zero as we approach the limit to 0, so you do regain the usual differential P+dP=IV+IdV+VdI
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top