MHB Solving for Slit Width-Wavelength Ratio at $\pm90°$ Diffraction Pattern

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the ratio of slit width to wavelength for the first minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern occurring at ±90°. The formula used is $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$, where $m = 1$. Participants clarify that the sign of $sin(\theta)$ corresponds to the order of minima, with positive values indicating minima to the right and negative values to the left of the central maximum. It is concluded that the absolute value should be taken for the ratio, as negative values lack meaningful interpretation in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of single-slit diffraction patterns
  • Familiarity with the formula $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$
  • Knowledge of the concept of minima in wave interference
  • Basic trigonometry, particularly the sine function
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the single-slit diffraction formula
  • Investigate the implications of negative orders of minima in diffraction
  • Learn about the effects of varying slit width on diffraction patterns
  • Study the relationship between wavelength and diffraction in different materials
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, optical engineers, and anyone studying wave phenomena in optics will benefit from this discussion.

MermaidWonders
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
For what ratio of slit width to wavelength will the first minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern occur at $\pm 90°$?

The thing is, when I did it, I used the formula $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$, and used the fact that $m = 1$ and $\pm 90°$ to solve for $\frac{a}{\lambda}$. However, I don't know if we're supposed to plug in $-90°$ for $sin\theta$, because that would mean that our ratio of $\frac{n\lambda}{a}$ would be $-1$ as opposed to just $1$ (when $sin90°$ was plugged in)...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MermaidWonders said:
For what ratio of slit width to wavelength will the first minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern occur at $\pm 90°$?

The thing is, when I did it, I used the formula $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$, and used the fact that $m = 1$ and $\pm 90°$ to solve for $\frac{a}{\lambda}$. However, I don't know if we're supposed to plug in $-90°$ for $sin\theta$, because that would mean that our ratio of $\frac{n\lambda}{a}$ would be $-1$ as opposed to just $1$ (when $sin90°$ was plugged in)...
More or less we can take the sign of [math]sin( \theta )[/math] to be "attached" to the n. A positive n describes the nth minima to the right of the central maximum and a negative n describes the nth minima to the left of the central maximum.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
More or less we can take the sign of [math]sin( \theta )[/math] to be "attached" to the n. A positive n describes the nth minima to the right of the central maximum and a negative n describes the nth minima to the left of the central maximum.

-Dan

OK, makes sense. So should I take the absolute value, since a negative ratio wouldn't be very meaningful in this context?
 
Last edited:
MermaidWonders said:
OK, makes sense. So should I take the absolute value, since a negative ratio wouldn't be very meaningful in this context?
Yup.

Double check the angle on the |n| = 1 interpretation I gave you. I might have screwed up left and right. But in the long run, no, it doesn't really matter.

-Dan
 
Yeah, OK, makes sense. Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K