Solving for Slit Width-Wavelength Ratio at $\pm90°$ Diffraction Pattern

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the ratio of slit width to wavelength for the first minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern occurring at $\pm 90°$. It involves the application of the diffraction formula and the interpretation of angles and signs in the context of diffraction patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to use $-90°$ for $sin\theta$ in the formula $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$, noting that this would yield a negative ratio.
  • Another participant suggests that the sign of $sin(\theta)$ can be associated with the integer $n$, indicating the position of the minima relative to the central maximum.
  • A later reply proposes taking the absolute value of the ratio, questioning the meaningfulness of a negative ratio in this context.
  • There is a suggestion to double-check the interpretation of the angle associated with $|n| = 1$, indicating some uncertainty about the left and right minima.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the interpretation of the sign of $sin(\theta)$ and its relation to $n$, but there remains uncertainty regarding the use of negative angles and the implications for the ratio.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the interpretation of angles and the conditions under which the ratio is meaningful, as well as the potential for confusion about the left and right minima in the diffraction pattern.

MermaidWonders
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
For what ratio of slit width to wavelength will the first minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern occur at $\pm 90°$?

The thing is, when I did it, I used the formula $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$, and used the fact that $m = 1$ and $\pm 90°$ to solve for $\frac{a}{\lambda}$. However, I don't know if we're supposed to plug in $-90°$ for $sin\theta$, because that would mean that our ratio of $\frac{n\lambda}{a}$ would be $-1$ as opposed to just $1$ (when $sin90°$ was plugged in)...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MermaidWonders said:
For what ratio of slit width to wavelength will the first minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern occur at $\pm 90°$?

The thing is, when I did it, I used the formula $sin\theta = \frac{n\lambda}{a}$, and used the fact that $m = 1$ and $\pm 90°$ to solve for $\frac{a}{\lambda}$. However, I don't know if we're supposed to plug in $-90°$ for $sin\theta$, because that would mean that our ratio of $\frac{n\lambda}{a}$ would be $-1$ as opposed to just $1$ (when $sin90°$ was plugged in)...
More or less we can take the sign of [math]sin( \theta )[/math] to be "attached" to the n. A positive n describes the nth minima to the right of the central maximum and a negative n describes the nth minima to the left of the central maximum.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
More or less we can take the sign of [math]sin( \theta )[/math] to be "attached" to the n. A positive n describes the nth minima to the right of the central maximum and a negative n describes the nth minima to the left of the central maximum.

-Dan

OK, makes sense. So should I take the absolute value, since a negative ratio wouldn't be very meaningful in this context?
 
Last edited:
MermaidWonders said:
OK, makes sense. So should I take the absolute value, since a negative ratio wouldn't be very meaningful in this context?
Yup.

Double check the angle on the |n| = 1 interpretation I gave you. I might have screwed up left and right. But in the long run, no, it doesn't really matter.

-Dan
 
Yeah, OK, makes sense. Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K