Solving Gamma Matrices Identity Problems in Particle Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses two specific problems related to Gamma matrices identities in particle physics. The first problem involves the Fermion propagator, where the user incorrectly calculates the expression for ##/\!\!\!p^2##, mistakenly introducing a factor of 4. The correct approach clarifies that ##/\!\!\!p^2 = p^2## through proper index relabeling and application of the anticommutation relations of Gamma matrices. The second problem pertains to the helicity operator and its commutation with the Dirac Hamiltonian, which is resolved by recognizing the implications of the Gamma matrices' anticommutation relations as outlined in reference [arXiv:1006.1718].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gamma matrices and their properties in quantum field theory.
  • Familiarity with the Dirac equation and Fermion propagators.
  • Knowledge of the helicity operator and its role in particle physics.
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and index manipulation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Gamma matrices and their anticommutation relations in detail.
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of the Dirac equation in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the helicity operator and its applications in particle physics.
  • Review the mathematical techniques for manipulating tensor indices in theoretical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying quantum field theory who are working with Gamma matrices and Fermion propagators.

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi all,
I make some
exercises in particle physics but I'm stuck in two problems related to Gamma matrices identities,
First: the Fermion propagator ## \frac {i } { /\!\!\!p - m} = i \frac { /\!\!\!p + m } { p^2 - m^2} ## So how ##/ \!\!\!\!p ^2 = p^2 ## ? Where ## /\!\!\!p = \gamma_\mu p^\mu ##.

I think ##/ \!\!\!\!p ^2 = \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu p^\nu =
\gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu g^{\mu\nu} p_\mu = \gamma_\mu \gamma^\mu p^2 = 4 p^2 ##, so I got a factor 4 ! What's wrong here?

Second: It's related to the helicity operator, ## h= S . \bf{p} ## ( where S is 2 by 2 matrix, with ##\sigma^i ## on the diagonal ), that as mentioned in a reference as [arXiv:1006.1718], it commutes with the Dirac Hamiltonian ## H = \gamma^0 ( \gamma^i p^i + m ) ## equ. (3.3), due to Gamma matrices anticommutation relation, but this isn't clear for me at all..

Thanx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about the second one, but on the first one, you've just been sloppy with your summation indices, and you've used μ as a summation index twice. If you do what you were trying to do correctly, you get:
\not p \not p = \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu p^\nu = \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu g^{\nu \lambda}p_\lambda = \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma^\lambda p_\lambda= ?

An easier way to see it is as follows:

\not p \not p= \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^\mu p_\mu \gamma^\nu p_\nu + \gamma^\nu p_\nu \gamma^\mu p_\mu)= \frac{1}{2}p_\mu p_\nu(\gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu + \gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{2}p_\mu p_\nu 2 g^{\mu \nu} = p_\mu p^\mu = p^2
 
For the first question:
##/ \!\!\!\!p ^2 = / \!\!\!\!p ^2## so by simple relabling
## \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu p^\nu = \gamma_\nu p^\nu \gamma_\mu p^\mu ##
now ##/ \!\!\!\!p ^2 = \frac{1}{2}( / \!\!\!\!p ^2 + / \!\!\!\!p ^2) ##
## \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu p^\nu = \frac{1}{2}( \gamma_\mu p^\mu \gamma_\nu p^\nu + \gamma_\nu p^\nu \gamma_\mu p^\mu) = \frac{1}{2}\left\{ \gamma_\mu,\, \gamma_\nu\right\}p^\nu p^\mu##
since ##[p^\nu, p^\mu ] = 0 ##
You should be able to finish the last one or two steps from here.

Edit: I didn't refresh my browser to see someone beat me to it before posting. Oh well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K