Solving Inequality With Complex Numbers Question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0 and its implications when |p|^2 > c. It is clarified that complex numbers do not form an ordered field, making the definition of "<" for complex numbers inconsistent. However, the expression can be simplified to 2 Re(pz), allowing for a real number interpretation of the inequality. The direction of the inequality depends on the sign of the imaginary part of p, with the graph representing a shaded region above or below a dotted line. The importance of |p|^2 > c remains unclear in relation to the inequality's graphical representation.
sarahs52
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
"Solving Inequality With Complex Numbers" Question

Homework Statement



What does the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0 represent if |p|^2 >c ?

Homework Equations



p is a constant and a member of the set of complex numbers. c is a constant and a member of the set of real numbers.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, for the EQUALITY pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0, where p = a+ib, z = x+iy :

pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0 => (a+ib)(x+iy) + conjugate((a+ib)(x+iy)) + c = 0 => ax + iay + ibx - by + ax - iay -ixb -by + c = 0 => y=((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

So, the inequality is y> ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

MY QUESTION IS: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF --> |p|^2 >c WHEN SHOWING THE INEQUALITY --> pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0.

I know that |p| = sqrt((a^2) + (b^2)), so |p|^2 >c implies ((a^2) + (b^2)) > c but I don't understand how this helps to show the the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0... or more so, the inequality y > ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

ALSO, if I were to graph this inequality, would it be a (diagonal) dotted line (I say dotted because points on the line are not a part of the solution) where the graph is shaded above the dotted line?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


sarahs52 said:

Homework Statement



What does the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0 represent if |p|^2 >c ?
It doesn't represent anything because the complex numbers do NOT form an "ordered field". There is no way to define "<" for complex numbers consistent with their arithmetic.

Homework Equations



p is a constant and a member of the set of complex numbers. c is a constant and a member of the set of real numbers.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, for the EQUALITY pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0, where p = a+ib, z = x+iy :

pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0 => (a+ib)(x+iy) + conjugate((a+ib)(x+iy)) + c = 0 => ax + iay + ibx - by + ax - iay -ixb -by + c = 0 => y=((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

So, the inequality is y> ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

MY QUESTION IS: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF --> |p|^2 >c WHEN SHOWING THE INEQUALITY --> pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0.

I know that |p| = sqrt((a^2) + (b^2)), so |p|^2 >c implies ((a^2) + (b^2)) > c but I don't understand how this helps to show the the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0... or more so, the inequality y > ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

ALSO, if I were to graph this inequality, would it be a (diagonal) dotted line (I say dotted because points on the line are not a part of the solution) where the graph is shaded above the dotted line?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 


HallsofIvy said:
It doesn't represent anything because the complex numbers do NOT form an "ordered field". There is no way to define "<" for complex numbers consistent with their arithmetic.

That doesn't seem to be quite right, since the resulting expression is a real number.
And for real numbers the "<" inequality is defined.

pz + conjugate(pz) = 2 Re(pz)
 
I don't see any particular relevance either to |p|2 > c.

So, the inequality is y> ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

Not quite.
The direction of the inequality depends on the sign of b.
If b is negative, the inequality is inverted.


And I agree that you get a shaded half surface bounded by your dotted line.
You only have to be careful, which half surface you have exactly.
 


I like Serena said:
That doesn't seem to be quite right, since the resulting expression is a real number.
And for real numbers the "<" inequality is defined.

pz + conjugate(pz) = 2 Re(pz)
Right, I completely missed that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K