Solving Inequality With Complex Numbers Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0, where p is a complex number and c is a real number, particularly focusing on the implications of the condition |p|^2 > c.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the inequality in the context of complex numbers and question the validity of defining an order for complex numbers. There is also discussion on how the condition |p|^2 > c relates to the inequality and its graphical representation.

Discussion Status

Some participants express skepticism about the inequality's relevance due to the properties of complex numbers, while others suggest that the resulting expression can be interpreted in terms of real numbers. There is ongoing exploration of how the sign of b affects the direction of the inequality.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of defining inequalities for complex numbers and the implications of the condition |p|^2 > c on the inequality being discussed. There is also mention of the graphical representation of the inequality, including the nature of the boundary line.

sarahs52
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
"Solving Inequality With Complex Numbers" Question

Homework Statement



What does the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0 represent if |p|^2 >c ?

Homework Equations



p is a constant and a member of the set of complex numbers. c is a constant and a member of the set of real numbers.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, for the EQUALITY pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0, where p = a+ib, z = x+iy :

pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0 => (a+ib)(x+iy) + conjugate((a+ib)(x+iy)) + c = 0 => ax + iay + ibx - by + ax - iay -ixb -by + c = 0 => y=((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

So, the inequality is y> ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

MY QUESTION IS: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF --> |p|^2 >c WHEN SHOWING THE INEQUALITY --> pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0.

I know that |p| = sqrt((a^2) + (b^2)), so |p|^2 >c implies ((a^2) + (b^2)) > c but I don't understand how this helps to show the the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0... or more so, the inequality y > ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

ALSO, if I were to graph this inequality, would it be a (diagonal) dotted line (I say dotted because points on the line are not a part of the solution) where the graph is shaded above the dotted line?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


sarahs52 said:

Homework Statement



What does the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0 represent if |p|^2 >c ?
It doesn't represent anything because the complex numbers do NOT form an "ordered field". There is no way to define "<" for complex numbers consistent with their arithmetic.

Homework Equations



p is a constant and a member of the set of complex numbers. c is a constant and a member of the set of real numbers.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, for the EQUALITY pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0, where p = a+ib, z = x+iy :

pz + conjugate(pz) + c = 0 => (a+ib)(x+iy) + conjugate((a+ib)(x+iy)) + c = 0 => ax + iay + ibx - by + ax - iay -ixb -by + c = 0 => y=((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

So, the inequality is y> ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

MY QUESTION IS: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF --> |p|^2 >c WHEN SHOWING THE INEQUALITY --> pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0.

I know that |p| = sqrt((a^2) + (b^2)), so |p|^2 >c implies ((a^2) + (b^2)) > c but I don't understand how this helps to show the the inequality pz + conjugate(pz) + c < 0... or more so, the inequality y > ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

ALSO, if I were to graph this inequality, would it be a (diagonal) dotted line (I say dotted because points on the line are not a part of the solution) where the graph is shaded above the dotted line?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 


HallsofIvy said:
It doesn't represent anything because the complex numbers do NOT form an "ordered field". There is no way to define "<" for complex numbers consistent with their arithmetic.

That doesn't seem to be quite right, since the resulting expression is a real number.
And for real numbers the "<" inequality is defined.

pz + conjugate(pz) = 2 Re(pz)
 
I don't see any particular relevance either to |p|2 > c.

So, the inequality is y> ((a/b)*x)+ c/(2*b).

Not quite.
The direction of the inequality depends on the sign of b.
If b is negative, the inequality is inverted.


And I agree that you get a shaded half surface bounded by your dotted line.
You only have to be careful, which half surface you have exactly.
 


I like Serena said:
That doesn't seem to be quite right, since the resulting expression is a real number.
And for real numbers the "<" inequality is defined.

pz + conjugate(pz) = 2 Re(pz)
Right, I completely missed that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K