Solving Inverse Laplace Transform w/ Convolution Integral: Ch 8, Sec 10 #3

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
Boas Ch. 8, Sec. 10 #3

Use the convolution integral to find the inverse transforms of:
[tex] \frac{p}{(p^{2}-1)^{2}} = \frac{p}{p^{2}-1} \frac{1}{p^{2}-1}[/tex]

I'm completely confused with these things. Are we supposed to figure out the inverse Laplace transform and then use that within our convolution integral? I am completely lost. Just looking for some advice, thanks.

I know the convolution integral takes the form of:
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty\,f(x)g(z-x)dx[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mateomy said:
Boas Ch. 8, Sec. 10 #3

Use the convolution integral to find the inverse transforms of:
[tex] \frac{p}{(p^{2}-1)^{2}} = \frac{p}{p^{2}-1} \frac{1}{p^{2}-1}[/tex]

I'm completely confused with these things. Are we supposed to figure out the inverse Laplace transform and then use that within our convolution integral? I am completely lost. Just looking for some advice, thanks.

I know the convolution integral takes the form of:
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty\,f(x)g(z-x)dx[/tex]

For functions defined on [0,∞) the convolution is, instead:
[tex]\int_0^z f(x) g(z-x) \, dx \text{ for }z \geq 0.[/tex]
And yes, you are supposed to figure out the inverse Laplace of p/(p^2-1), then do a convolution, exactly as it says.
 
Just to clarify, you mean '..inverse Laplace of
[tex] \frac{p}{(p^{2}-1)^{2}}[/tex]
right?
 
So far...
[tex] \int \frac{p}{(p^{2}-1)^{2}}dp[/tex]
getting...
[tex] \frac{-1}{2(p^{2}-1)}[/tex]

Now do I look for the inverse transform? Because If I do that my answer slightly varies from the book's. Boas shows:
[tex] \frac{tsinht}{2}[/tex]
whereas I'm getting
[tex]\frac{sinht}{2}[/tex]

..hmmm?

(thanks for the help)
 
However, if I actually paid attention to what you had said maybe I'd be doing something different. I'll try the 'real' method now...
 
After finding my inverse transform, being [itex]cosh(at)sinh(at)[/itex] I used their exponential forms to integrate.
[tex] \int_0^\infty \left(\frac{e^{at}+e^{-at}}{2}\right)\frac{e^{at}-e^{-at}}{2}dt[/tex]
...which I end up getting
[tex] \frac{1}{2}\left(cosh(at)-t\right)[/tex]
which still isn't right.

Clearly, I'm confused.
 
Then I'm even more lost...