Solving Kinematics Problem: Dropped Object Distance & Height

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving an object dropped from a height, where it travels one-fourth of its distance in the last second of the fall. The initial equation used is x = x_0 + (1/2)at^2, assuming the object starts from rest. The main confusion arises in the transition from the equation 1/4 t^2 = t^2 - (t - 1s)^2 to (t - 1s) = ±√(3/4). Clarification is provided that the correct form should be (t - 1s) = ±t√(3/4). The discussion highlights the importance of understanding variable rearrangement in solving kinematics problems.
mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
Reading a step-by-step problem in my Kinematics chapter; the problem states: "An object is dropped travels one-fourth its distance in the last second of the fall. What height was it dropped from?

They initially use the motion equation:

<br /> x= x_0 + \frac{1}{2}at^2<br />

(sans the v(Initial) because it is assumed it is dropped from rest)

I can follow that they have to at first solve for time "t" but they move on down the line of variable rearrangement and come to a certain spot where
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA how they go from this...

<br /> \frac{1}{4}t^2 = t^2 - (t - 1s)^2<br />

to this...

<br /> (t - 1s) = \pm \sqrt{\frac{3}{4}}<br />

I understand that this might be sort of confusing with no real frame of reference within the problem. I was being to lazy to LaTex all of the steps. I can supply more if requested (ugh).
I've been ruminating over this for the last god-knows-how-long. Maybe I am just fried.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mateomy! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

that should be (t - 1s) = ±t√(3/4) :smile:
 
Thank you so much, you have no idea how much time I wasted staring at this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top