Solving Muon Momentum Decay: Maximizing Expression & Intuition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aleolomorfo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Particle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding an expression for muon momentum in relation to the angle, with initial attempts proving complex. The author outlines their calculations involving momentum conservation and energy equations, ultimately leading to a maximum energy scenario for the muon when it moves forward. They propose solving the problem in the rest frame of the kaon before transforming to the lab frame, which simplifies the calculations. The conclusion suggests that the approach and resulting values for muon momentum appear correct. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the challenges of deriving expressions and the utility of intuitive reasoning in particle physics.
Aleolomorfo
Messages
70
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Consider the decay ##K \rightarrow \mu + \nu##. Find the maximum ##\mu## momentum in a frame in which the ##K## momentum is 5 GeV
Relevant Equations
## P = (E, p_x, p_y, p_z)##
## P^2 = m^2##
My first idea was to find an expression of the muon momentum as a function of the angle and then maximaze the expression. But my attempts were not succesful. I report here my attempt.

Set up (referring to the attached file "bettini.pdf"):
$$ p = (\sqrt{p_k^2+m_k^2},0,0,p_k)$$
$$ k_1 = (\sqrt{p_{\mu}^2+m_{\mu}^2},0,p_{\mu}\sin{\theta}, p_{\mu}\cos{\theta})$$
$$ k_2 = (p_{\nu},0,-p_{\nu}\sin{\phi}, p_{\nu}\cos{\phi})$$

My attempt:

$$ p = k_1 + k_2 $$
$$ k_2 = p - k_1$$

Squaring

$$ k_2^2 = p^2 + k_1^2 -2pk_1$$
$$ 0 = m_k^2 + m_{\mu}^2 - 2\sqrt{(p_k^2+m_k^2)(p_{\mu}^2+m_{\mu}^2)} + 2p_kp_{\mu}\cos{\theta}$$

Continuing from here the computation to obtain ##p_{\mu}## as a function of ##\cos{\theta}## is quite demanding.

My second idea was to think intuitively that the case in which the muon momentum is maximum is when it flies forward and the neutrino backward. And in this particular case the computation is easier.

To sum up, my two questions are: Is there a way to perform my first idea? Is my second idea right?

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
What I'd suggest is solving the problem in the rest frame of the kaon and then transforming back to the lab frame.
 
vela said:
What I'd suggest is solving the problem in the rest frame of the kaon and then transforming back to the lab frame.

I have attached the file with the set up.

$$ p = (m_k, 0, 0, 0)$$
$$ k_1 = (E_{\nu},0,0, E_{\nu})$$
$$ k_2 = (E_{\mu}, 0,0, -\sqrt{E_{\mu}^2-m_{\mu}^2})$$

Using the conservation of momentum and energy I get:

$$E_{\mu} = \frac{m_k^2+m_{\mu}^2}{2m_k} = 258.15 MeV $$
$$ p_{\mu} = \sqrt{E_{\mu}^2-m_{\mu}^2} = 235,53 MeV $$

Then I make the assumption that the muon has the maximum energy when it flies forward in the LAB frame:

$$\beta = \frac{p_k}{\sqrt{p_k^2+m_k^2}} = 1 $$
$$ \gamma = \frac{\sqrt{p_k^2+m_k^2}}{m_k} = 10$$

Using Lorentz transformation:

$$ p_{\mu}^{lab, max} = \gamma(p_{\mu}^{CM} + \beta E_{\mu}^{CM}) $$

Then substituting the numerical value I get the answer. Is it right?
 

Attachments

Looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes Aleolomorfo
vela said:
Looks good.

Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top