Solving PDF with set boundary values

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ein Krieger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary Pdf Set
Ein Krieger
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am give probability distribution function f(x)=(e(-x/1000))/1000 of the time to failure of an electronic component in a copier

The question is to determine the number of hours at which 10% of all components have failed.

My solution:
1) PDF was integrated to obtain: f(x)= e(-x/1000)

2) Then, I used e(-x/1000)=0.1 with upper boundary x, and lower boundary is 0 to find x as the number of hours at which all 10% of components have failed. However, entering it in calculator, I couldn't obtain solution. What did I wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ein Krieger said:
I am give probability distribution function f(x)=(e(-x/1000))/1000 of

1) PDF was integrated to obtain: f(x)= e(-x/1000)

You're using "f(x)" inconsistently to stand for two different things and your antiderivative is missing a negative sign.

\int \frac{e^{-x/1000}}{1000} dx = - e^{-x/1000} + C

You can't compute a deterministic answer for the time when 10% of the components have failed since that time is a random variable. Perhaps you want to compute the time at which the probability that a component has failed then or earlier reaches .10. Your description of what you did with the calculator isn't clear.
 
Ein Krieger,

I am pretty sure you are leaving out one critical part of the definition of f(x). The pdf is

f(x) =\frac{1}{1000} e^{-x / 1000}
for x \ge 0, zero otherwise.

So you should integrate f(x) from 0 to x; you will get a different answer for the cdf than you got before.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
You're using "f(x)" inconsistently to stand for two different things and your antiderivative is missing a negative sign.

\int \frac{e^{-x/1000}}{1000} dx = - e^{-x/1000} + C

You can't compute a deterministic answer for the time when 10% of the components have failed since that time is a random variable. Perhaps you want to compute the time at which the probability that a component has failed then or earlier reaches .10. Your description of what you did with the calculator isn't clear.

Yes. Sure. You are right. Time is continuous variable so it is inconsistent to try to define exact probability. All we need is to get probability for time range.

awkward said:
Ein Krieger,

I am pretty sure you are leaving out one critical part of the definition of f(x). The pdf is

f(x) =\frac{1}{1000} e^{-x / 1000}
for x \ge 0, zero otherwise.

So you should integrate f(x) from 0 to x; you will get a different answer for the cdf than you got before.

I have already calculated, and I got 105 hours. is it right?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top