Solving Planet A's Semi-Major Axis Ratio To Planet B's

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of the semi-major axes of two planets, A and B, based on the observed maximum angular separation of 16 degrees from their star. Participants suggest visualizing the orbits and applying trigonometry, specifically using the sine function to relate the radii of the orbits. There is a consensus that for circular orbits, the radius equals the semi-major axis, simplifying the calculation. However, complications arise when considering elliptical orbits, particularly when the perihelion directions are misaligned, affecting the observed angular size. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding orbital dynamics in determining the semi-major axis ratio.
zeromaxxx
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are one of the first astronomers in a civilization on Planet B in another solar system. With your unaided eye, you follow planet A in the same solar system and note that it never gets further away than 16 degrees from the star (around which both planets orbit).

What is the ratio of the size of Planet A's semi-major axis
to that of Planet B?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I seem to have trouble visualizing this scenario and so I don't know how to approach the problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sketch a star and the orbits of two planets in circular motion. With such a small angle, we must be on the planet of the larger circle; mark its position anywhere on the circle. Mark the points where the inner planet will appear furthest away from the star. With a bit of trigonometry you should be able to find the answer.
 
Would it be sin(16) = Ra/Rb
I know that gives that the ratio of the radius' but I'm not to sure how to find the semi-major axis
 
For circular orbits, the radius IS the semi-major axis.
Perhaps the use of the term implies you are to consider elliptical orbits. I suspect that would result in the same answer.
 
Delphi51 said:
For circular orbits, the radius IS the semi-major axis.
Perhaps the use of the term implies you are to consider elliptical orbits. I suspect that would result in the same answer.

It gets quite a bit more complicated when the orbits are elliptical and the perihelion directions are not aligned (the major axes are not collinear). Mutual distance plays a big role in the observed angular size, and the "width" of the orbit varies with viewing angle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top