Solving Reciprocal Trigonometric Equation cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
AN630078
Messages
242
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
Hello, I have been practising reciprocal trigonometric equations and have found a question to solve;

cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4 giving all answers in the range 0 °<θ<360 °

I am not actually struggling to solve the equation, but rather how to find the solutions in the given range.
Relevant Equations
cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4
cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4
cot^2θ+5cosecθ-4=0
cosec^2θ+5cosec-4-1=0
cosec^2θ+5cosec-5=0
Let u=cosecθ
u^2+5u-5=0
Solve using the quadratic formula;
u=(-5± 3√5)/2
u=(-5+ 3√5)/2=0.8541...
Substitute cosecθ=u
Therefore, cosecθ=0.8541
1/sinθ=0.8541
sinθ=1/0.8541=1.170... which is not true since sin x cannot be greater than 1 for real solutions.

u=(-5-3√5)/2=-5.8541...
cosecθ=-5.8541...
1/sinθ=(-5-3√5)/2
1*2=(-5-3√5)*sinθ
2=(-5-3√5)*sinθ
2/(-5-3√5)=sinθ
Multiply by the conjugate;
2*(-5+3√5)/(-5-3√5)(-5+3√5)=2*(-5+3√5)/-20=-(-5+3√5)/10
sinθ=-(-5+3√5)/10
My difficulty is solving this last part, do I then take the arcsin of -(-5+3√5)/10?
θ=arcsin(-(-5+3√5)/10)
θ=-0.17166 + 2πn, θ=π+0.17166+2πn
Since the solutions should be in the range 0 °<θ<360 ° should I convert this from radians to degrees?
θ=-0.17166=-9.8353935.. °~-9.84 °which falls outside the specified range, but -9.84 °+360 °=350.16° (which is within the range)
and θ=π+0.17166=3.31325 rad=189.835... ° ~ 189.8 ° to 1.d.p
Other solutions 189.8 °+360 °=549.8° (which lies outside the given range)

So would the solutions in the range 0 °<θ<360 ° be θ=189.8 °and θ=350.16°?
I would be very grateful of any advice 👍
 
on Phys.org
fresh_42 said:
I got the same result.
Thank you for your reply, so the solutions in the range 0 °<θ<360 ° would be θ=189.8 °and θ=350.16°?
 
Yes. I haven't checked the digits behind the point though, but it was 9.8°sth. I checked whether it is a better number in radians, but that didn't look any better. I first thought your polynomial was wrong, until I realized that I calculated in sine instead of your cosecans.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078
epenguin said:
What is 'reciprocal' about it?
The reciprocal of sinθ is cosecθ.
 
fresh_42 said:
Maybe the co's: cosec, cotan; all inverses of the 'normal'.
Yes, that is what I meant 😁
 
fresh_42 said:
Yes. I haven't checked the digits behind the point though, but it was 9.8°sth. I checked whether it is a better number in radians, but that didn't look any better. I first thought your polynomial was wrong, until I realized that I calculated in sine instead of your cosecans.
Thank you for your reply. Oh splendid, just to ask what do you mean be 9.8°sth?
 
fresh_42 said:
Nine point eight degrees something, i.e. ##9.8\ldots °##
Oh, ok I was confused by the "something". Thank you for explaining 👍
 
fresh_42 said:
My fault, and worst of all: such an internet speak is against the rules ...:mad:
Not sure whether I can give myself a warning?!
No do not worry, I am pleased you have used it, now I know its meaning 😁
 
fresh_42 said:
Maybe the co's: cosec, cotan; all inverses of the 'normal'.

OK, equations involving the reciprocal trig functions - reciprocal.equations are something else (equations where the reciprocals of roots are also roots).

The co's are not inverses, but the arcsin etc. which you use to get the angles are inverses of the trig functions.

I got the same exact result.
Good insight there that you realized that even if the calculator gives you only one solution, there has to be another.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078