Solving Related Rates Problems: Tips and Tricks for Finding Maximum Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdfsystema
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a problem related to the maximum height of a projectile, specifically analyzing the height function s(t) of a ball thrown vertically. Participants are exploring the concepts of related rates and derivatives in the context of motion under gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the problem, with some asserting it is a related rates problem while others disagree. There are attempts to derive the maximum height using derivatives, and questions arise about the interpretation of the function s(t) and its graph. Some participants express uncertainty about the values obtained from solving the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches to finding the maximum height and questioning the validity of their calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the derivative and the significance of the values obtained, but no consensus has been reached on the correct interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific requirements for how answers should be presented, including the need for clarity in units and the interpretation of results.

asdfsystema
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
s3okus.jpg


I believe this is a related rates problem.

I attempted part 2 but I'm not sure about the equation for the maximum height. is it the derivative ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't a related rates problem. The height of the ball is given by the function s(t). The ball goes straight up, slowing as it goes, and momentarily stops. After that, it falls straight down.

The function you're given describes the height of the ball relative to time. What is the shape of this graph? The high point of the graph tells you the height of the ball at its highest position, and the time when it gets there.

For the second part, your derivative is correct, but if you evaluate the derivative at t = 0, what you're getting is the velocity at t = 0. IOW, the velocity when the ball is thrown.

Use your given function to find when s(t) = 0. Whatever time you get is the time when the ball hits the ground. Use that value in your velocity function to find the ball's velocity when it hits.
 
Find derivative of s(t) and set it equal to zero, and then solve for time. The time you get when you do this tells you when the ball stops moving going up, in other words this is the time when your balls final velocity is zero. Take this time and plug it back to your s(t) equation and it tells you the maximum height of the ball.
 
part A.

it is a parabola with a max , so the maximum height will be at the max point in the graph.

s(t) = 48t+64t-16t^2
take derviative . s'(t) = 64 -32t
set to zero t= 2 . plug t back in original?

48(2)+64(2)-16(2)^2 = 160


Part B.


i did what you suggested.
s(t) = 48+64t-16t^2 = 0

I get -(t+1) (t+4) sooo t= -1 and t=-4 ??

i know what to do next but I am getting two "t" values right now ..
 
asdfsystema said:
part A.

it is a parabola with a max , so the maximum height will be at the max point in the graph.

s(t) = 48t+64t-16t^2
take derviative . s'(t) = 64 -32t
set to zero t= 2 . plug t back in original?

48(2)+64(2)-16(2)^2 = 160
To clarify what you wrote,
s'(t) = 0 ==> t = 2
s(2) = 160
Your calculations are correct, but what are the units here? Many instructors require that you state your answer in words.
asdfsystema said:
Part B.


i did what you suggested.
s(t) = 48+64t-16t^2 = 0

I get -(t+1) (t+4) sooo t= -1 and t=-4 ??
You started with an equation: 48 + 64t - 16t^2 = 0.
Each step should be an equation.
If I multiply the factors you show, I get -t^2 - 5t -4. Is that related to what you started with?
asdfsystema said:
i know what to do next but I am getting two "t" values right now ..
 
Oops sorry I was posting the wrong equation haha.

I meant (-t-1)(t+3)

which will give me -t^2-4t-3 and is the same as -16t^2+64t+48 after dividing the whole thing by 16.

What is my next step ?
 
Your next step is to go back and factor the left side of the equation -16t^2 +64t + 48 again. This time, try to get the right factors.
Also, each step should be an equation.
 
ok i factored it again

x= 4.6457
x= -0.6457

What do I do next ... ?
 
OK, now you have the right numbers.
What do they represent in terms of this problem? (You have them as values of x, but the original equation doesn't involve x.)

As for "what do I do next?" look at the original problem and try to understand what it is that you are doing. What you have done is find values for which s(t) = 0. Do you understand why you needed to do that, and what you have to do next? If you don't, take a look at message #2.
 
  • #10
s(t) = 48+64t-16t^2

v(t)= 64-32t

v(4.6457)= 64-32(4.6457)

v(t) = -84.6624

is that correct ?
 
  • #11
The numbers look about right. What are the units?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K