Solving Shrodinger Eqn for Constrained System: Negative Energy Levels?

sudabe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If we solve the shrodinger equation for a constrained system we will find some negative energy levels.The nagative sign shows that this energy is released and no longer exist in the system.
Then how we can say the system is in this level with this ENERGY?
are we talking about something that doesn't exist?
I appreciate if you help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, its just a negative energy offset that makes your energy negative, the ground state is always existing, and not "released". You could always add a constant to a potential energy, since it won't affect forces f=d(V(x)-E0)/dx=dV/dx. It will redefine your reference point of energy only.
 
then what is the relation between the energy levels and binding energy?
If no energy will be released(when a bound system is formed) then where does the binding energy come from?
 
the convention s normal to set all bound states negative in atomic like potentials, for example V=-1/r, so if you add the binding energy (by light) you excite the electron up to V=0, meaning its free from the nucleus.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top