Solving the Definite Integral Using Right Riemann Sums

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
16 replies · 13K views
Weave
Messages
143
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following sum
[tex]\sqrt{9 - \left(\frac{3}{n}\right)^2} \cdot \frac{3}{n} + \sqrt{9 - \left(\frac{6}{n}\right)^2} \cdot \frac{3}{n} + \ldots + \sqrt{9 - \left(\frac{3 n}{n}\right)^2} \cdot \frac{3}{n}[/tex]
is a right Riemann sum for the definite integral. Solve as n->infinity
[tex]\int_0^b f(x)\, dx[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]\int_0^b f(x)\, dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't seem to get this one. My work is a bit long to show but I get
(9/n^3) *Sigma(i=1,n) [sqrt(n^2+i^2)]
not sure what to do here, do i substitute Sigma(i=1,n)(i^2=(n(n+1))/2?c
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
my mistake, I am suppose to solve the sum as n-> infinity
 
Hi, there is a result I'm sure you're aware of that says that if a function f is continuous on [a,b], then

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{b-a}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}f \left( a+i\frac{b-a}{n}\right) =\int_a^bf(x)dx[/tex]

Well this is what you got to use. You just have to find the proper f(x) and what a and b are.
 
Last edited:
ok so I've had that originally but I some how got to get i by itself(to the right of the sigma) and sub in
[tex]\frac{n(n+1)}{2}[/tex]
that will get rid or the sigma, then I can rearrange and solve for the limit. But how to do that?
 
I didn't understand a word you said.

Did you read my post? There are no limits to solve. You only have to find f, a and b such that the formula of post #7 becomes that of post #8 (modulo the limit symbol).
 
ok so [tex]f(x)=\sqrt(9-x^2)[/tex] a=0 and b=3
giving:
[tex]\int_0^3 \sqrt(9-x^2) dx=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{3}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sqrt{9-\left(\frac{3i}{n}\right)^2}[/tex]
Is that what your sayin is the answer?
My homework problem says" The limit of these Riemann sums as [tex]n \to \infty[/tex] is...(blank).
And I am suppose to type something in.
 
Last edited:
Yes, bravo, you've got it.

Now that you know that this weird looking sum is actually equal to an integral, you can use the fundamental theorem of calculus to evaluate the integral and get yourself a nice numerical value for the sum.
 
Thanks quasar.
If I could ask you a hint on one more problem I would be ever more greatful.
Suppose f(x) is continuous and decreasing on the closed interval [tex]3\le x\le 11, that f(3)=7, f(11)=4 and that \displaystyle \int_{3}^{11}f(x)\,dx=46.918141.<br /> Then \displaystyle \int_{4}^{7}f^{-1}(x)\,dx[/tex]=?
 
This is easily done graffically knowing that the integral is the area under the curve. All you have to do is convince yourself that the integral of f^-1 is the area btw the curve and the y axis.
 
ok, but we are not really given the function, we have the area on the interval 3,11. not sure where to go there
 
Like I said it's easy once you graphically represent the situation. You'll be able to extract the area btw the curve and the y-axis by substracting a small 3x4 square and 46.918141 to a big 7x11 square.
 
Haha..thats not hard at all, I guess I was expecting something different with the
f(x)-1 but I see now. thanks Quasar.
 
ew, gross :P Riemann sum, we learned a bit about it in precalculus this year. well i have a lot to look forward to next year *eyeroll* I'm sure it won't be that bad when i learn it