Solving the Primitive Root Problem for g & -g Modulo p

  • Thread starter Thread starter b0mb0nika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primitive Root
AI Thread Summary
the integer -g is a primitive root modulo p, while if p ≡ 3 (mod 4), -g is not a primitive root. The distinction arises from the properties of primitive roots and their relationship to quadratic residues. Specifically, for p ≡ 1 (mod 4), there exists an integer X such that X^2 ≡ -1 (mod p), allowing -g to also generate the group. Conversely, for p ≡ 3 (mod 4), such an integer does not exist, leading to a contradiction if -g were assumed to be a primitive root. Thus, the solution to the problem hinges on the congruence of p modulo 4.
b0mb0nika
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
let g be a primitive root of the odd prime p
show that -g is a primitive root or not according as
p==1 ( mod 4) or p==3(mod4)

how would i start in solving this problem
thanks
:cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For p==1 Mod 4, there exists an X such that X^2 ==-1 Mod p. This is not true for p==3 Mod 4. If x is a primitive root then x^((p-1)/2) = -1 since the smallest power of x that is 1 Mod p is x^(p-1). So, those are the facts needed.
 


To start solving this problem, we first need to understand what a primitive root is and how it relates to the given conditions of p.

A primitive root, also known as a primitive element, is an integer g that generates the multiplicative group of integers modulo p. This means that for any integer a coprime to p, there exists an integer k such that g^k ≡ a (mod p). In other words, g raised to different powers can produce all the possible remainders when divided by p.

Now, let's consider the two cases given: p ≡ 1 (mod 4) and p ≡ 3 (mod 4).

Case 1: p ≡ 1 (mod 4)
In this case, p can be expressed as p = 4q + 1 for some integer q. This means that p is congruent to 1 modulo 4.

Using this information, we can show that -g is also a primitive root modulo p.
Since g is a primitive root, we know that g^q ≡ -1 (mod p).
Multiplying both sides by -1, we get (-g)^q ≡ 1 (mod p).
This shows that -g is also a primitive root modulo p.

Case 2: p ≡ 3 (mod 4)
In this case, p can be expressed as p = 4q + 3 for some integer q. This means that p is congruent to 3 modulo 4.

Using this information, we can show that -g is not a primitive root modulo p.
Assume that -g is a primitive root, then (-g)^q ≡ 1 (mod p) for some integer q.
But we know that g^q ≡ -1 (mod p) from the definition of primitive root.
Multiplying both sides by -1, we get (-g)^q ≡ 1 (mod p).
This means that (-g)^q ≡ g^q ≡ -1 (mod p).
However, this contradicts the fact that g is a primitive root.
Therefore, -g is not a primitive root modulo p in this case.

In conclusion, the statement holds true and the solution depends on the congruence of p modulo 4. If p ≡ 1 (mod 4),
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top