MHB Solving the Quasi-Linear 1-D Wave Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the quasi-linear 1-D wave equation with piecewise constant initial conditions, leading to the formation of two shocks at x = ±x0. The participants analyze the characteristics of the wave equation, deriving expressions for the density and shock velocities. They confirm that shock formation occurs due to intersecting characteristic lines at the boundaries defined by the initial conditions. The shock velocities are calculated using the jump conditions, revealing that the shock speeds depend on the density values at the shock locations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding shock dynamics in the context of the given wave equation.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Consider the quasi-linear 1-D wave equation
$$
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} + 2\rho\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial x} = 0
$$
with the piecewise constant initial conditions
$$
\rho(x,0) = \begin{cases}
\rho_1, & x < -x_0\\
\rho_2, & -x_0 < x < x_0\\
\rho_3, & x > x_0
\end{cases}
$$
where $\rho_1 > \rho_2 > \rho_3$ and $\rho_i, x_0\in\mathbb{R}$ with $i = 1, 2, 3$.Argue that two shocks form at $x = \pm x_0$ in this case and sketch the space-time diagram for the density field.

I have no idea on what to do or how to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$\frac{dt}{ds} =1\Rightarrow t = s + c$ but when $t(0) = 0$ $t = s$.

$\frac{dx}{ds} = 2\rho\Rightarrow x = 2\rho t + x_0$ at $t=0$, $x=x_0$. So $x_0 = x-2\rho t$.

$$
\rho(x-2\rho t,0) = \begin{cases}
\rho_1, & x-2\rho t < -x_0\\
\rho_2, & -x_0 < x-2\rho t < x_0\\
\rho_3, & x-2\rho t > x_0
\end{cases}
$$

Is this what I should be doing? If so, what next?
 
Last edited:
Then we obtain $t(r) = r$, $x(r) = 2\rho r + x_0$, and $\rho(r) = c$ when $t = 0$.
Let $s$ be a parameter.
Then $\rho(r;s) = f(s)$, $x(r;s) = 2tf(s) + s$, and $t(r;s) = r$.
In order to determine shock, we need to find the Jacobian.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\mathcal{J} & = & \det\begin{pmatrix}
x_r & x_s\\
t_r & t_s
\end{pmatrix}\\
& = & \frac{\partial x}{\partial r}\frac{\partial t}{\partial s} - \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\frac{\partial t}{\partial r}\\
& = & 0 - (2tf'(s) + 1)\\
& = & -2tf'(s) - 1
\end{alignat*}

Correct?
 
Since we have that $t = r$, we can make the substitution
$$
x = 2t\rho + x_0.
$$
Let's put the equation in the form of $y = mx + b$ or in our case $t = mx + x_0$.
So we have
$$
t = \frac{x - x_0}{2\rho}.
$$
A shock will occur when two characteristic lines intersect or there is a jump discontinuity.
To view that $\pm x_0$ causes shock, for simplicity, let $x_0 = 1$, $\rho_1 = 3$, $\rho_2 = 2$, and $\rho_3 = 1$.
Then the characteristic lines are
\begin{alignat*}{5}
t & = & \frac{x - 1}{6}, & \ \ \text{for} & \ \ x < -1\\
t & = & \frac{x - 1}{4}, & \ \ \text{for} & \ \ -1 < x < 1\\
t & = & \frac{x - 1}{2}, & \ \ \text{for} & \ \ x > 1
\end{alignat*}
At $-x_0 = -1$, we have $t = \frac{-1}{3}$ and $t = \frac{-1}{2}$.
Therefore, we have a jump discontinuity at $-x_0$.
For $x_0 = 1$, $t = 0$, i.e. we have two intersecting characteristic lines.
Since the choice of $x_0$ and $\rho$ were arbitrary, $\pm x_0$ will cause a shock for all choices.
 
How can I determine shock velocity?

We know that $q = \rho u$ and that $2\rho = \frac{dq(\rho)}{d\rho}$.
Solving this equation we get that $q = \rho^2$.
The shock velocity is $\frac{dx_s}{dt} = \frac{q(x_{s-},t) - q(x_{s+},t)}{\rho(x_{s-},t) - \rho(x_{s+},t)}$.
The shock velocity for $x = -x_0$ is
$$
\frac{dx_s}{dt} = \frac{\rho_1^2 - \rho_2^2}{\rho_1 - \rho_2},
$$
and when $x = x_0$, we have
$$
\frac{dx_s}{dt} = \frac{\rho_2^2 - \rho_3^2}{\rho_2 - \rho_3}.
$$

Correct?What is this asking?Determine the location in space-time where the shocks intersect.
Again use the concept of the jump condition to determine the shock speed of the single shock front that results from the merging of the two initial shocks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
283
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K