MHB Solving the Quasi-Linear 1-D Wave Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Consider the quasi-linear 1-D wave equation
$$
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} + 2\rho\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial x} = 0
$$
with the piecewise constant initial conditions
$$
\rho(x,0) = \begin{cases}
\rho_1, & x < -x_0\\
\rho_2, & -x_0 < x < x_0\\
\rho_3, & x > x_0
\end{cases}
$$
where $\rho_1 > \rho_2 > \rho_3$ and $\rho_i, x_0\in\mathbb{R}$ with $i = 1, 2, 3$.Argue that two shocks form at $x = \pm x_0$ in this case and sketch the space-time diagram for the density field.

I have no idea on what to do or how to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$\frac{dt}{ds} =1\Rightarrow t = s + c$ but when $t(0) = 0$ $t = s$.

$\frac{dx}{ds} = 2\rho\Rightarrow x = 2\rho t + x_0$ at $t=0$, $x=x_0$. So $x_0 = x-2\rho t$.

$$
\rho(x-2\rho t,0) = \begin{cases}
\rho_1, & x-2\rho t < -x_0\\
\rho_2, & -x_0 < x-2\rho t < x_0\\
\rho_3, & x-2\rho t > x_0
\end{cases}
$$

Is this what I should be doing? If so, what next?
 
Last edited:
Then we obtain $t(r) = r$, $x(r) = 2\rho r + x_0$, and $\rho(r) = c$ when $t = 0$.
Let $s$ be a parameter.
Then $\rho(r;s) = f(s)$, $x(r;s) = 2tf(s) + s$, and $t(r;s) = r$.
In order to determine shock, we need to find the Jacobian.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\mathcal{J} & = & \det\begin{pmatrix}
x_r & x_s\\
t_r & t_s
\end{pmatrix}\\
& = & \frac{\partial x}{\partial r}\frac{\partial t}{\partial s} - \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\frac{\partial t}{\partial r}\\
& = & 0 - (2tf'(s) + 1)\\
& = & -2tf'(s) - 1
\end{alignat*}

Correct?
 
Since we have that $t = r$, we can make the substitution
$$
x = 2t\rho + x_0.
$$
Let's put the equation in the form of $y = mx + b$ or in our case $t = mx + x_0$.
So we have
$$
t = \frac{x - x_0}{2\rho}.
$$
A shock will occur when two characteristic lines intersect or there is a jump discontinuity.
To view that $\pm x_0$ causes shock, for simplicity, let $x_0 = 1$, $\rho_1 = 3$, $\rho_2 = 2$, and $\rho_3 = 1$.
Then the characteristic lines are
\begin{alignat*}{5}
t & = & \frac{x - 1}{6}, & \ \ \text{for} & \ \ x < -1\\
t & = & \frac{x - 1}{4}, & \ \ \text{for} & \ \ -1 < x < 1\\
t & = & \frac{x - 1}{2}, & \ \ \text{for} & \ \ x > 1
\end{alignat*}
At $-x_0 = -1$, we have $t = \frac{-1}{3}$ and $t = \frac{-1}{2}$.
Therefore, we have a jump discontinuity at $-x_0$.
For $x_0 = 1$, $t = 0$, i.e. we have two intersecting characteristic lines.
Since the choice of $x_0$ and $\rho$ were arbitrary, $\pm x_0$ will cause a shock for all choices.
 
How can I determine shock velocity?

We know that $q = \rho u$ and that $2\rho = \frac{dq(\rho)}{d\rho}$.
Solving this equation we get that $q = \rho^2$.
The shock velocity is $\frac{dx_s}{dt} = \frac{q(x_{s-},t) - q(x_{s+},t)}{\rho(x_{s-},t) - \rho(x_{s+},t)}$.
The shock velocity for $x = -x_0$ is
$$
\frac{dx_s}{dt} = \frac{\rho_1^2 - \rho_2^2}{\rho_1 - \rho_2},
$$
and when $x = x_0$, we have
$$
\frac{dx_s}{dt} = \frac{\rho_2^2 - \rho_3^2}{\rho_2 - \rho_3}.
$$

Correct?What is this asking?Determine the location in space-time where the shocks intersect.
Again use the concept of the jump condition to determine the shock speed of the single shock front that results from the merging of the two initial shocks.
 
Last edited:
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top