Solving the Vector Triple Product Equation: Deduction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the vector triple product and its properties, specifically focusing on proving a relationship involving multiple cross products. The original poster presents two parts: the first part involves showing a specific vector identity, while the second part requires deducing another identity using the first result.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to expand terms using the definition of the triple vector product but encounters difficulties in simplifying the results. Some participants suggest using the first part of the problem to assist with the second part, while others propose specific substitutions to facilitate the proof.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in exploring different approaches to the problem. Some have provided guidance on how to substitute terms from the first part into the second part, while others are verifying the correctness of their expansions and calculations. There is a mix of agreement and correction among participants regarding the steps taken.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential misunderstandings regarding the implications of the term "deduce" and how it relates to the use of previously established results. Some participants express uncertainty about their expansions and seek clarification on specific steps.

cordines
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
i) Show that: a x ( b x c) + b x ( c x a) + c x (a x b ) =0
I managed to this, by expanding each term using the definition of the triple vector product i.e. a x ( b x c) = (a.c)b-(a.b)c and adding the results.

ii) and deduce that

a x { b x ( c x d ) } + b x { c x ( d x a ) } + c x { d x ( a x b) } + d x { a x ( b x c ) } =
( a x c ) x ( b x d)

I expanded each term like i did in the first an added the results an obtained:
-(d x b)(b.a) - (d.a)(c x b) - (b x a)(c.d) - (b.c)(a x d )

Clearly the result does not agree, and I can't find any means how to simplify it. Some help anyone? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi cordines! Welcome to PF! :smile:
cordines said:
I expanded each term like i did in the first …

Noooo :redface:

you've ignored the hint

it says "deduce", which means that you should use i) to do it. :wink:
 
Actually at first that's what I did by substituting a x ( b x c) = - b x ( c x a) - c x (a x b ) into d x { a x ( b x c ) } and using the triple vector definition for the other three, however it was all but in vain.

Any other suggestions on how I can substitute i) in ii) ?
 
cordines said:
Any other suggestions on how I can substitute i) in ii) ?

Yes … replace c in i) by c x d :wink:
 
As in...

To prove: a x { b x ( c x d ) } + b x { c x ( d x a ) } + c x { d x ( a x b) } + d x { a x ( b x c ) } = ( a x c ) x ( b x d)

Proof:

a x ( b x c ) = ( a . c )b - (a . b)c
a x { b x ( c x d ) } = { a . (c x d) }b - (a.b)(c x d) ... [1]

b x ( c x a ) = (b . a)c - ( b . c)a
b x { c x ( d x a ) } = (b . a)(c x d) - { b. (c x d) }a ... [2]

c x ( a x b ) = ( c . b )a - (c . a)b
c x { d x ( a x b) } = { (c x d) . b }a - { (c x d) . a }b ... [3]

Adding [1], [2] and [3] we obtain 0 which verifies with the proof in i).

For the last term,

d x { a x ( b x c ) } = d x { (a . c)b - (a . b) c }
= (a . c) ( d x b) - (a . b) (d x c)

which does not agree. I think I'm missing something. Did I expand it correctly? Thanks for your patience.
 
cordines said:
b x ( c x a ) = (b . a)c - ( b . c)a
b x { c x ( d x a ) } = (b . a)(c x d) - { b. (c x d) }a ... [2]

c x ( a x b ) = ( c . b )a - (c . a)b
c x { d x ( a x b) } = { (c x d) . b }a - { (c x d) . a }b ... [3]

Your [2] and [3] are completely wrong. :redface:

Try again. :smile:
 
b x ( c x d ) = (b . d)c - (b . c)d
a x { b x ( c x d ) } = (a x c)(b . d) - (a x d)(b .c) ...[1]

or should [1] stay as: a x { b x ( c x d ) } = { a . (c x d) }b - (a.b)(c x d)

c x ( d x a ) = (c . a)d - (c . d)a
b x { c x ( d x a ) } = (b x d)(c . a) - (b x a)(c . d) ...[2]

d x (a x b ) = (d . b)a - (d . a)b
c x { d x (a x b) } = ( c x a)(d . b) - (c x b)(d . a) ...[3]

a x ( b x c ) = (a . c)b - (a . b) c
d x { a x ( b x c ) } = (a . c) ( d x b) - (a . b) (d x c) ...[4]

Is it correct?
 
hi cordines! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
cordines said:
b x ( c x d ) = (b . d)c - (b . c)d
a x { b x ( c x d ) } = (a x c)(b . d) - (a x d)(b .c) ...[1]

or should [1] stay as: a x { b x ( c x d ) } = { a . (c x d) }b - (a.b)(c x d)

yes! :rolleyes:

(and [2] [3] and [4] should look similar)

get some sleep, then try again :smile:
 
cordines said:
i) Show that: a x ( b x c) + b x ( c x a) + c x (a x b ) =0
I managed to this, by expanding each term using the definition of the triple vector product i.e. a x ( b x c) = (a.c)b-(a.b)c and adding the results.

ii) and deduce that

a x { b x ( c x d ) } + b x { c x ( d x a ) } + c x { d x ( a x b) } + d x { a x ( b x c ) } =
( a x c ) x ( b x d)

I expanded each term like i did in the first an added the results an obtained:
-(d x b)(b.a) - (d.a)(c x b) - (b x a)(c.d) - (b.c)(a x d )

Clearly the result does not agree, and I can't find any means how to simplify it. Some help anyone? Thanks

The proof you are seaching are derived from the axioms of the vector space and can be found in any of Schaums compendiums!
 
  • #10
To prove: a x { b x ( c x d ) } + b x { c x ( d x a ) } + c x { d x ( a x b) } + d x { a x ( b x c ) } = ( a x c ) x ( b x d)

Proof:

a x { b x ( c x a ) } = {a . (c x d) }b - (a.b)(c x d)

b x { c x ( d x a ) } = b x { (c.a)d - (c.d)a }
= (c.a)(b x d) - (c.d)(b x a)

c x { d x ( a x b ) } = {c . (a x b) }d - (c.d)(a x b)

d x ( a x ( b x c ) } = d x { (a . c)b - (a . b)c }
= (a . c)(d x b) - (a . b)(d x c)

Adding gives:

{a . (c x d) }b + (c . (a x b) }d = { a x c . d }b - { a x c . b }d
= ( a x c ) x ( b x d)

Proved! Thanks
 
  • #11
cordines said:
a x { b x ( c x a ) } = {a . (c x d) }b - (a.b)(c x d)

Looks good, well done! I just spotted one typo in the first line of your proof: you wrote a instead of d on the left hand side.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K