Solving the wave equation with change of variables approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving the wave equation using a change of variables approach, specifically for the partial differential equation (PDE) of the form ##au_{xx}+bu_{xt}+cu_{tt}+du_x+eu_t+fu=0##. The participants explore the transformation to new variables ##ξ = x + ct## and ##η = x - ct##, leading to the simplification of the wave equation to ##u_{ξη}=0##. The conversation emphasizes that both the textbook method and the participant's approach yield equivalent solutions, confirming the independence of the classification of PDEs from the coordinate system used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with change of variables in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of wave equations and their properties
  • Basic integration techniques in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of characteristics for solving PDEs
  • Learn about the classification of PDEs and their implications
  • Explore the separation of variables technique in more depth
  • Investigate the implications of coordinate transformations on PDE solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on wave phenomena, as well as anyone interested in advanced techniques for solving partial differential equations.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
421
Homework Statement
Kindly see the attachment below
Relevant Equations
D'Alembert approach (change of variables )
I am refreshing on the pde's, and i am trying to understand how the textbook was addressing change of variables, i find it a bit confusing. I will share the textbook approach, then later share my own understanding on change of variables approach. Here is the textbook approach;

1638706553231.png

1638706654514.png

My approach on this change of variables would look like this,
Let the pde be of the form;
##au_{xx}+bu_{xt}+cu_{tt}+du_x+eu_t+fu=0##
Consider the pde; ##u_{tt}= c^2u_{xx}## then we may use the change of variables as indicated by literature into working out the solution...

Now letting, ##ξ = x +ct## and ##η= x-ct##, then it follows that,
##u_x##=## u_ξ⋅ξ_x + u_η⋅η_x## =##u_ξ + η_x##
##u_{xx}## = ##u_x⋅u_ξ⋅ξ_x + u_x⋅u_η⋅η_x## = ##u_x⋅u_ξ+u_x⋅u_η## = ##[u_ξ⋅ξ_x + u_η⋅η_x]⋅u_ξ +[u_ξ⋅ξ_x + u_η⋅η_x]⋅u_η## = ##u_{ξξ} + 2u_{ξη} + u_{ηη}##
Similarly, i can show that,
##u_t## =## cu_ξ - cu_η ## ... Note that ##[u_t## =##u_ξ ⋅ξ_t + u_η ⋅η_t]##
##u_{tt}##= ##u_t⋅u_ξ⋅ξ_t +u_t ⋅u_η⋅ η_t##=... ##c^2u_{ξξ}-2c^2u_ξ⋅u_η +c^2u_{ηη}##
also,
##u_{xt}##= ##u_x⋅u_ξ⋅ξ_t + u_x⋅u_η⋅η_t##

My point is that, since i understand this quite well then i should not bother with the textbook approach as both ways would work towards the same solution...right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
HI,

You left out a chunk of the text in the book, and now compare the section intended to show that the classification of PDEs is independent of the coordinate system ## -## for which they consider a change of variable ##-## with one specific change of variable that works for your wave equation.

So in your case both ways are equivalent, yes.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
This is a continuation of the same 'subject' content...now looking at the highlighted part...
1638762517432.png

I want to be certain that i am getting it right,...on substituting for ##u_{xx}## and ##u_{tt}##we shall end up with;
##-4c^2u_{ξη}=0##
which simplifies to ##u_{ξη}=0##...

the other parts seem to be straightforward; ie
1638764275397.png


we can get the highlighted solution by integrating,
##cφ^{'}(x)-cΦ^{'}(x) ##=## g(x)##
On integration, we shall get;
##cφ(x)-cΦ(x)##=##\int_{x_0}^x g(s)ds##...from this we can establish that;
##φ(x) - Φ(x)##=## \frac {1}{c}## ##\int_{x_0}^x g(s)ds##...(1)
##φ(x) + Φ(x)##=##f(x)##...(2)

solving (1) and (2) simultaneously yields the highlighted solution ##Φ(x)## ... the second solution can also be found in a similar approach.

In the second approach to solving this, i.e by use of... separation of variables... using ##u(x,t) = X(x) T(t)## seems to be straightforward...phew
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K