Solving Total Differential Homework Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemphys1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving total differentials and partial derivatives, specifically focusing on the expression for z(x,y) defined as f(x/y). Participants are attempting to show a relationship involving partial derivatives of z with respect to x and y.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the meaning of the function f(x/y) and its implications for the total differential of z. There are questions regarding the validity of the original statement and whether it holds true for specific examples, such as z = x/y. Some participants are also discussing the notation used for partial derivatives and its interpretation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants questioning the correctness of the original problem statement and others providing examples to illustrate their points. There is a divergence in understanding regarding the notation and the implications of the function definition, leading to a mix of interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express difficulty with mathematical notation, which may be impacting their ability to follow the discussion. The original problem's context appears to be under scrutiny, with calls for clarification on the notation and assumptions involved.

chemphys1
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If z(x,y) = f(x/y)
show that

x(∂z/∂x)y + y(∂z/∂y)x = 0

Homework Equations



so I understand z(x,y)
means I can write
dz = (∂z/∂x)ydx + (∂z/∂y)x dyI do not understand the = f(x/y) bit though?
does that mean this?
df= (∂f/∂x)y dx+ (∂f/∂y)x dy
and (∂f/∂x)y = -y/x2 (∂f/∂y)x = 1/x

although that seems wrong can't manipulate to get the answer

any help on the method or explaining f(x/y) equalling z(x,y) would be appreciated. maths is not my strongest so if possible go as basic as it comes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chemphys1 said:

Homework Statement



If z(x,y) = f(x/y)
show that

x(∂z/∂x)y + y(∂z/∂y)x = 0

That isn't true. Try it for z = f(x/y) = x/y. Generally speaking, if everything is continuous, you would have ##z_{xy} = z_{yx}## and you wouldn't expect to multiply one by x and the other by y and have them be equal with opposite signs. Did you copy the problem correctly, parentheses and all?
 
LCKurtz said:
That isn't true. Try it for z = f(x/y) = x/y. Generally speaking, if everything is continuous, you would have ##z_{xy} = z_{yx}## and you wouldn't expect to multiply one by x and the other by y and have them be equal with opposite signs. Did you copy the problem correctly, parentheses and all?

complete question is attached, but the information in the original post is correctly copied as far as I can see
 

Attachments

  • question.png
    question.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 431
Like I said, it is false without more context. Check my example yourself.
 
LCKurtz said:
Like I said, it is false without more context. Check my example yourself.

Sorry, I really do not follow
I find it hard to understand mathematical notation, so re: z = f(x/y) = x/y
I can't see how to check the example
 
chemphys1 said:
Sorry, I really do not follow
I find it hard to understand mathematical notation, so re: z = f(x/y) = x/y
I can't see how to check the example

You are familiar with the notation f(x) as describing a function of x. Similarly, f(x/y) just means you have some function in the variable x/y. You can instead consider u=x/y and then you are back to the more familiar f(u).

But with LCKurtz's example of f(x/y)=x/y, I get the equation to be satisfied. I also get it to be satisfied in general. I think LCKurtz simply misread the notation, that's all.
 
CAF123 said:
You are familiar with the notation f(x) as describing a function of x. Similarly, f(x/y) just means you have some function in the variable x/y. You can instead consider u=x/y and then you are back to the more familiar f(u).

But with LCKurtz's example of f(x/y)=x/y, I get the equation to be satisfied. I also get it to be satisfied in general. I think LCKurtz simply misread the notation, that's all.

Are you saying that ##\left(\frac {\partial z}{\partial x}\right)_y## means something other than ##\frac \partial {\partial y}\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right )## or, as I wrote ##z_{xy}##?
 
LCKurtz said:
Are you saying that ##\left(\frac {\partial z}{\partial x}\right)_y## means something other than ##\frac \partial {\partial y}\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right )## or, as I wrote ##z_{xy}##?
Yes, I took ##\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right)_y## to mean, say, differentiate z wrt x, keeping y held fixed. Similarly for the other case. I actually thought that was a standard notation, although I have seen cases where they simply suppress the variable being held constant because in a sense it is obvious from the problem.
 
LCKurtz said:
Are you saying that ##\left(\frac {\partial z}{\partial x}\right)_y## means something other than ##\frac \partial {\partial y}\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right )## or, as I wrote ##z_{xy}##?

CAF123 said:
Yes, I took ##\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right)_y## to mean, say, differentiate z wrt x, keeping y held fixed. Similarly for the other case. I actually thought that was a standard notation, although I have seen cases where they simply suppress the variable being held constant because in a sense it is obvious from the problem.

Well, that's a new one on me. In over 40 years of teaching calculus using many different texts, I never encountered that notation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K