Solving transcedental equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter russel.arnold
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation tan(f(x)) = g(x), it's essential to define a specific range, as tan has infinite asymptotes. For accuracy, numerical methods can be employed, with the choice depending on the required precision. Since the focus is on the range from 0 to infinity and high accuracy is needed, a graphical approach is deemed insufficient. Evaluating f(x) and using a series expansion of the tangent function can yield accurate solutions. This method is effective for determining all possible solutions to the equation.
russel.arnold
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
i want to solve tan (f(x)) = g(x) ..also i want to determine all the possible solutions!
which numerical method i should use?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no one answer.

Since tan has an infinite number of asymptotes, the first questions I'd have to ask is, will you be considering a particular range? Once you have a range, any numerical method could do the job.

I'd also wonder how accurate do you need solutions? To two decimal places? Three? Four? . . . If you didn't need a high degree of accuracy, perhaps even a graphical approach would work for you.
 
yes, i will be considering tan from 0 to infinity, i.e all possible branches

and i need my solutions to be accurate. hence graphical approach won't work :(
 
I would first evaluate f(x) and then use that result in the series expansion of tangent taken however far you want to get the accuracy you desire to solve.

That will work for all possible solutions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top