Solving Two Boxes & Friction Motion Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoeTrumpet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves two boxes with static and kinetic friction coefficients of 0.75 and 0.20, respectively. The upper box weighs 4 kg and the lower box weighs 3 kg. The correct approach to determine the least time for both boxes to move 4.0 m without the upper box sliding is to calculate the net force considering both friction types. The net force equation is derived as 0.75*m1*g - 0.2*g*(m1 + m2) = a*(m1 + m2), where 'a' is the acceleration of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Ability to apply kinematic equations
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of net force in systems with friction
  • Learn how to apply kinematic equations to solve for time and distance
  • Explore the concept of combined mass systems in physics
  • Investigate the effects of different friction coefficients on motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and friction, as well as educators looking for examples of problem-solving in dynamics.

JoeTrumpet
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I understand how to get the question right, but my friend posed an alternate method that is wrong and I was wondering why his method doesn't work.

Homework Statement


The coefficient of static friction is 0.75 between two blocks stacked on one another. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force F vector acting on the upper block to the right causes both blocks to cross a distance of 4.0 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

The upper box is 4kg and the lower box is 3kg.

Homework Equations


Upper box: Fxtotal = F - fs = m1*a (my guess is I made a mistake here since it wasn't pertinent to my solution)
Lower box: Fxtotal = fs - fk = m2*a

where a1 = a2 = a because of motion together.

Upper box: Fytotal = N = m1*g
Lower box: Fytotal = N = m1*g + m2*g

The Attempt at a Solution


I simply solved the lower equation for a and plugged it into the proper kinematic equation. However, my friend wrote from intuition F - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which happens to be a combination of my two Fxtotal equations, and said that to maximize the distance F would have to equal fs, thus getting fs - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which clearly would yield a response different from mine. I was wondering if anyone could clear up for us why it's wrong. I figure it has to either do with his assumption that F = fs or with my first equation and his overall equation (or both).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoeTrumpet said:
I understand how to get the question right, but my friend posed an alternate method that is wrong and I was wondering why his method doesn't work.

Homework Statement


The coefficient of static friction is 0.75 between two blocks stacked on one another. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force F vector acting on the upper block to the right causes both blocks to cross a distance of 4.0 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

The upper box is 4kg and the lower box is 3kg.

Homework Equations


Upper box: Fxtotal = F - fs = m1*a (my guess is I made a mistake here since it wasn't pertinent to my solution)
Lower box: Fxtotal = fs - fk = m2*a

where a1 = a2 = a because of motion together.

Upper box: Fytotal = N = m1*g
Lower box: Fytotal = N = m1*g + m2*g

The Attempt at a Solution


I simply solved the lower equation for a and plugged it into the proper kinematic equation. However, my friend wrote from intuition F - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which happens to be a combination of my two Fxtotal equations, and said that to maximize the distance F would have to equal fs, thus getting fs - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which clearly would yield a response different from mine. I was wondering if anyone could clear up for us why it's wrong. I figure it has to either do with his assumption that F = fs or with my first equation and his overall equation (or both).

Thanks!

Your equation on the lower box overlooks that whatever acceleration there is must include the mass of both boxes.

The clearer way to view it for me is to look at what the maximum force may be applied. And that is simply .75*m1*g

From that you subtract the frictional force which is the combined weight times .2.

So the net force available then is .75*m1*g - .2*g*(m1 + m2)
That in turn equals the force available to accelerate the two boxes as a system, namely

.75*m1*g - .2*g*(m1 + m2) = a * (m1 + m2)

Then figure your time the usual way with kinematics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K