Solving Work with Constant Force and Gravity on Mass in a Vertical Circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter particlemath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Loop Work
AI Thread Summary
A constant tangential force F acts on a mass m moving in a vertical circle with radius r, starting from rest at the top. The work done on the mass is calculated as 2*pi*r*F, but attempts to apply the work-energy theorem by separating the problem into two parts fail. The confusion arises from the initial condition of zero velocity and the role of gravity, which is a conservative force. It’s noted that while the radial force does not affect the work-energy calculation, further clarification on the calculations is needed to identify the error. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between work done and kinetic energy in this context.
particlemath
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I have a constant force F acting tangentially on a mass m in a vertical circle around a loop of radius r. The mass starts from rest at the very top of the loop. The only other force is gravity, that is m*g

Now I did Work=Change in energy with a system that is comprised of both the Earth and mass.

Here work is simply 2*pi*r*F.

When I try to solve this by seperating this into two parts, finding velocity at the bottom of the loop using work energy thm then using that as the initial velocity for another work energy theorem setup, it didn't work.

Why? Work energy theorem is supposed to work all the time. Gravity is conservative, so the results should be the same regardless.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you will have to show your working so someone can see where the error is.
 
hmm. to start with, if the particle initially has zero velocity, and there is only a tangential force F, plus gravity force, then the particle will not be able to move in a circle.

edit: although, the radial force should not matter for your work energy theorem calculation anyway, since it will be perpendicular to the particle's velocity. So anyway, what is it that you are calculating? (as CWatter says, more information would help). In the work-energy theorem method, I'm guessing you say that when the particle is initially at the top of the loop, it has zero kinetic energy, and the constant tangential force F acts on it as it goes around the loop once, so that work 2*pi*r*F is done on the particle, so when it has done the loop once, it should have kinetic energy equal to 2*pi*r*F, right?
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top