Solving x+3y=4-kz & 4x-2y=5+10z: Find the Solution Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations represented by the equations x + 3y = 4 - kz and 4x - 2y = 5 + 10z. Participants are exploring methods to determine the conditions under which the system has no unique solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods including row reduction and determinants to analyze the system of equations. There are attempts to clarify the implications of the wording regarding solutions and uniqueness. Some participants question the acceptability of different methods in the context of homework constraints.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with multiple participants providing insights into different approaches. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of precise language in mathematical problems, particularly regarding the distinction between "no solution" and "no unique solution." Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of row reduction and determinants.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the constraints of homework rules and the implications of using specific methods. There is a focus on ensuring that the approaches align with the expectations set by the assignment guidelines.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
426
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
linear equations
1653820532608.png


Find the solution here;
1653820571874.png


I will need to check which approach they used...probably some row- reduced echelon somewhere... anyway my approach;

##x+3y=4-kz##
##4x-2y=5+10z##
.................................
##4x+12y=16-4kz##
##4x-2y=5+10z##
.................................
##14y=11-4kz-10z##
.................................
From third equation,
##x+y+2z=1##
##y=1-2z-x##
##y=1-2z-(4-kz-3y)##
##-2y=-3-2z+kz## multiplying this by ##7##
.................................
Therefore,
##14y=11-4kz-10z##
##-14y=-21-14z+7zk##
...................................
subtracting we get,
##10=3kz-24z##
##10=z(3k-24)##
.................................
For no unique solution, we set
##3k-24=0##
##k=8##

Probably you may inform me which approach they used...just the form...otherwise, i can check this up later...

Arrrrgh i have seen it...using determinant! cheers guys.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Using determinant, we shall have;
##1(-4+10)-3(8+10)+k(4+2)=0##
##6-54+6k=0##
##6k=48##
##k=8## Bingo! learned this many years ago...going deep into my brain to remember...
 
Beware of the wording in this problem. Comparing the wording in your title ”has no solution” it has quite different meaning from the problem’s ”has no unique solution”.

In this case, there indeed are solutions. They are just not unique.
 
Orodruin said:
Beware of the wording in this problem. Comparing the wording in your title ”has no solution” it has quite different meaning from the problem’s ”has no unique solution”.

In this case, there indeed are solutions. They are just not unique.
Thanks...let me amend that...
 
We can also use the row-reduction method,

##\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 3 & k \\
2 & -1 & -5 \\
1 & 1 & 2
\end{bmatrix}##

##2R_1 -R_2##

##\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 3 & k \\
0 & 7 & 2k+5 \\
1 & 1 & 2
\end{bmatrix}##

##R_1-R_3##

##\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 3 & k \\
0 & 7 & 2k+5 \\
0 & 2 & k-2
\end{bmatrix}##

##2R_2-7R_3##

##\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 3 & k \\
0 & 14 & 4k+10 \\
0 & 0 & 7k-14
\end{bmatrix}##

##4k+10-(7k-14)=0##
##-3k+24=0##
##k=8##

Bingo!:cool:
 
Last edited:
Sorry allow me to ask...since ms are allowed to be followed 'strictly' to the latter...does it mean that any other approach/ method to solution wouldn't be accepted? like method shown in post ##1## and ##5.## Cheers.
 
chwala said:
.since ms are allowed to be followed 'strictly' to the latter
"ms are allowed to be followed... " -- What are "ms"?
Also, the phrase is "to the letter."
chwala said:
.does it mean that any other approach/ method to solution wouldn't be accepted? like method shown in post 1 and 5. Cheers.
Method in post 1 is an approach that would be taken by someone with no knowledge of matrix reduction methods. Method in post 5 relies solely on the determinant to be able to discern whether the matrix of coefficients is invertible.

An alternate method that is better than that used in post 5 is to use row reduction on the augmented matrix. That is, the 3 x 4 matrix that contains a 4th column that has the constants on the right sides of the given three equations.

When I worked the problem, the third row was ##\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & -24 + 3k & | &0 \end{bmatrix}##. This means that if k = 8, the bottom row consists solely of 0 elements, which further means that the three given equations are linearly dependent. Graphically, if k = 8, the three planes intersect at the least in a line in space.

On the other hand, if the bottom row had ended up with a nonzero constant in the 4th column, for example like this... ##\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & -24 + 3k & | &1 \end{bmatrix}##, that would represent the equation 0x + 0y + 0z = 1 (again with k = 8), which has no solution. In this case the system of equations would have no solution at all; i.e., no single point lies on all three of the given planes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala, Delta2 and Orodruin

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K