Solving z^5+16z'=0 in Complex Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the equation z^5 + 16 conjugate(z) = 0 for z in the complex numbers. Participants suggest using polar form instead of rectangular coordinates for simplification. They also highlight the importance of multiplying by z to transform the equation into a more manageable form, leading to r^4e^{6iθ} = -16. The use of De Moivre's theorem is recommended to find solutions, with specific values for r and θ discussed, such as r = 2 and θ = -π/2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representations (rectangular and polar forms).
  • Familiarity with De Moivre's theorem and its applications in solving complex equations.
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation involving complex variables.
  • Experience with solving polynomial equations in the complex plane.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about polar coordinates in complex analysis and their advantages over rectangular coordinates.
  • Study the application of De Moivre's theorem in solving complex equations.
  • Explore the concept of roots of unity and their significance in complex number solutions.
  • Investigate advanced techniques for factoring polynomials in the complex plane.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying complex analysis, educators teaching polynomial equations, and anyone interested in advanced algebraic techniques for solving complex equations.

planauts
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve z^5 + 16 conjugate(z) = 0 for z element of C.

z^5 + 16z' = 0

http://puu.sh/2EBqC.png

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



My first thought was to use z = a+bi and z' = a-bi
So:
(a+bi)5 + 16*(a-bi) = 0 + 0i And then expand and simplify to the real and non real parts. http://puu.sh/2EBwU.png
But it seems WAAY too complicated for a question worth only 4 marks.
I would appreciate if someone could post their thoughts.
Thanks!According to WolframAlpha: http://puu.sh/2EBKH.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi planauts! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
planauts said:
Solve z^5 + 16 conjugate(z) = 0 for z element of C.

try multipying by z :wink:
 
planauts said:

Homework Statement


Solve z^5 + 16 conjugate(z) = 0 for z element of C.

z^5 + 16z' = 0

http://puu.sh/2EBqC.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My first thought was to use z = a+bi and z' = a-bi
So:
(a+bi)5 + 16*(a-bi) = 0 + 0i And then expand and simplify to the real and non real parts. http://puu.sh/2EBwU.png
But it seems WAAY too complicated for a question worth only 4 marks.
I would appreciate if someone could post their thoughts.
Thanks!

According to WolframAlpha: http://puu.sh/2EBKH.png

I think you'll have better luck with polar form than with rectangular. Try it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with these guys. Also, there are more solutions than wolfram alpha said. the button "more roots" gives the rest. (just in case you were confused that your roots were not the same as the ones you saw in wolfram alpha).
 
tiny-tim said:
hi planauts! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

try multipying by z :wink:
z^6 + 16|z|^2 = 0
(z^3+4|z|i)(z^3-4|z|i) = 0
Factor further using sum and differences of cubes?

Dick said:
I think you'll have better luck with polar form than with rectangular. Try it.

I'm not sure what you mean,

r^5e^{5i\theta}+16re^{-i\theta}=0
r(r^4e^{5i\theta}+16e^{-i\theta})=0 r = 0
 
planauts said:
<br /> I&#039;m not sure what you mean,<br /> <br /> r^5e^{5i\theta}+16re^{-i\theta}=0<br /> r(r^4e^{5i\theta}+16e^{-i\theta})=0 r = 0
<br /> <br /> That&#039;s exactly what I mean. Now multiply both sides by ##e^{i\theta}## and start thinking about what ##\theta## and r values might give you a solution.
 
Dick said:
That's exactly what I mean. Now multiply both sides by ##e^{i\theta}## and start thinking about what ##\theta## and r values might give you a solution.

I end up with.
r^4e^{6i\theta} = -16

I know theta = -pi/2 and r = 2 would give a solution...

How would I manipulate this equation so I can use the De Moivre theorem?

Should I let 4w = 6theta

So
r^4*e^{4wi} = -16

Let p^4 = r*e^{wi} = -16
And then solve for p and change the w angles to theta? I know that r has to be definitely 2 though.

Am I over complicating things again?
 
planauts said:
I end up with.
r^4e^{6i\theta} = -16

I know theta = -pi/2 and r = 2 would give a solution...

How would I manipulate this equation so I can use the De Moivre theorem?

Should I let 4w = 6theta

So
r^4*e^{4wi} = -16

Let p^4 = r*e^{wi} = -16
And then solve for p and change the w angles to theta? I know that r has to be definitely 2 though.

Am I over complicating things again?

Maybe. Yes, r must be 2. So ##e^{6i\theta}=(-1)##. That means ##cos(6\theta)=(-1)## and ##sin(6\theta)=0##, right? That's deMoivre. I don't think it should be hard from there.
 
hi planauts! :smile:
planauts said:
z^6 + 16|z|^2 = 0
(z^3+4|z|i)(z^3-4|z|i) = 0 …

no, it's easier now to put z = |z|e instead,

giving you |z|4e6iθ = -24

(same as you got anyway)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K