Some basic questions on the way sets are defined

  • Thread starter Thread starter sa1988
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definitions and properties of sets, particularly focusing on subsets and elements within a given set "A", which contains sets as its elements. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the notation and concepts of subsets, elements, and functions, particularly in the context of set theory and Cartesian products.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify their understanding of subsets and elements in set "A", questioning the validity of their answers regarding specific statements about membership and subset relations. They also explore the implications of Cartesian products and the notation used in set theory.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's questions, providing feedback on their reasoning and suggesting areas for further exploration. Some participants challenge the original poster's interpretations and encourage deeper consideration of the definitions involved, while others express their own uncertainties, leading to a collaborative examination of the concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the distinction between the empty set and a set containing the empty set, as well as the implications of set notation in defining subsets. Participants are also navigating the complexities of function notation and Cartesian products, indicating a need for clarity in these foundational concepts.

sa1988
Messages
221
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


1zgb41.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Q.1

I'm a little confused with how subsets and elements are defined in the case of the given set "A" as it seems to be a set of sets, so I'm going to throw my answers out and would appreciate any guidance on where I'm wrong (if anywhere).

A = \Big\{\emptyset, \big\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\big\}\Big\}

"A" has two elements

a) \emptyset\subset A - True
b) \emptyset\in A - True
c) \{\emptyset\}\subset A - Not true
d) \{\emptyset\}\in A - Not true
e) \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\subset A - True
f) \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\in A - True

Q.2

Not sure what's going on here either. I think the issue is in my own flawed understanding of the notation used in sets generally.

f : R \rightarrow R such that f(x) = x^{2}

My understanding thus far is that the cartesian product of two sets X and Y is:

X \times Y = \{(x,y) : x\in X, y\in Y\}

So in the case of f(x) = x^2, we have:

a) f((-1,2)) = (-1,2) \times (-1,2) = \big((-1,-1),(-1,2),(2,-1),(2,2)\big)

but then part of me wonders if I've got it all wrong and it should really just be f((-1,2)) = ((1,4)) ..??

And then for part b:

b) f((-1,2]) = ... ...

I don't really understand this at all since it has a square bracket which I'm led to believe means it represents a continuous interval of numbers not including that which is on the side of the curled bracket (according to this - interval notation). If that's the case, I don't know how to perform X \times Y in the way I defined above.

And then we have stuff to do with f^{-1} which is a whole other thing entirely.

(Just to check - am I right in saying that f^{-1} on a set Y is all the elements x \in X such that f(x) \in Y ??)

Or in other words: f^{-1}(Y) = \{ x \in X : f(x) \in Y \} - right?

Hints much appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sa1988 said:

Homework Statement


1zgb41.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Q.1

I'm a little confused with how subsets and elements are defined in the case of the given set "A" as it seems to be a set of sets, so I'm going to throw my answers out and would appreciate any guidance on where I'm wrong (if anywhere).

A = \Big\{\emptyset, \big\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\big\}\Big\}

"A" has two elements

a) \emptyset\subset A - True
b) \emptyset\in A - True
c) \{\emptyset\}\subset A - Not true
d) \{\emptyset\}\in A - Not true
e) \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\subset A - True
f) \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\in A - True

You shouldn't post two questions in 1.

I don't agree with your answers. Which ones are you sure about?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
PeroK said:
You shouldn't post two questions in 1.

I don't agree with your answers. Which ones are you sure about?

To be honest I'm not sure on any of them so far.

My problem I think lies in that I don't understand the difference between \{\emptyset\} and \emptyset

To me it seems that one is the empty set, and the other is a set with the empty set in, which is just the empty set, so they're the same. This surely isn't the case because it makes things too trivial, but I don't know how else to interpret those two things.

Thanks.
 
sa1988 said:
To be honest I'm not sure on any of them so far.

My problem I think lies in that I don't understand the difference between \{\emptyset\} and \emptyset

To me it seems that one is the empty set, and the other is a set with the empty set in, which is just the empty set, so they're the same. This surely isn't the case because it makes things too trivial, but I don't know how else to interpret those two things.

Thanks.

There is a difference between the element ##a## and the set containing ##a##, denoted by ##\lbrace a \rbrace##. Similarly for the empty set. The set containing the empty set is not empty! It has one member: the empty set.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
You could replace the elements of ##A## by some other names, solve the questions and replace them backwards.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988 and PeroK
PeroK said:
There is a difference between the element ##a## and the set containing ##a##, denoted by ##\lbrace a \rbrace##. Similarly for the empty set. The set containing the empty set is not empty! It has one member: the empty set.

Excellent, thanks, I think it's all clicked now. Updated answers are below.

A = \Big\{\emptyset, \big\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\big\}\Big\}

"A" has two elements

a) \emptyset\subset A - NOT True because \emptyset is just an element, not a set, and therefore cannot be a subset
b) \emptyset\in A - True because it is an element of A
c) \{\emptyset\}\subset A - True since A = \Big\{\emptyset, \big\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\big\}\Big\} = \{\emptyset\}\cup \Big\{\big\{\emptyset,\{\emptyset\}\big\}\Big\}, so clearly \{\emptyset\}\subset A
d) \{\emptyset\}\in A - NOT true, this set is not en element of A.
e) \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\subset A - NOT True, it is only an element.
f) \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\in A - True.
 
To a): Can you tell all subsets of ##A=\{1,2\}\, ?## How many are there? Why doesn't the argument under c) apply?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
fresh_42 said:
To a): Can you tell all subsets of ##A=\{1,2\}\, ?## How many are there? Why doesn't the argument under c) apply?

Hmm, I hope I'm right in saying \emptyset, \{1\}, \{2\}, \{1,2\} are subsets of \{1,2\}.

This now leads me to question my result for part a) however...

Another way I'm seeing it is that the empty set is {} , hence {}, {1}, {2} and {1, 2} are subsets of {1,2}

So for { 0, {0,{0}} }, the subsets are {}, {0}, { {0,{0}} } and { 0, {0,{0}} }

and {} is the empty set ##\emptyset##

hence ##\emptyset \subset A## ..?
 
Last edited:
Yes, the empty set is always a subset, regardless what is in the set. You said it already under c) : ##A=A\cup\{\} \Rightarrow \{\} \subseteq A##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
Yes, the empty set is always a subset, regardless what is in the set. You said it already under c) : ##A=A\cup\{\} \Rightarrow \{\} \subseteq A##.

Great stuff, thanks.

So just to check - the answers I gave for a) to f) were correct apart from part a), which should have been 'true' since ##\emptyset## is always a subset of any set.
 
  • #11
If I didn't become confused myself, yes. In the original post c) and e) were wrong. e) could be "repaired" to be true with an additional bracket around: ##\{\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\} \subsetneq A\,,## because the element would be then in a set.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog and sa1988
  • #12
Great, thanks a lot. All understood now.

I'll have another look at Q2 tomorrow, probably in a new thread as requested.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #13
I think, for d, at least for F(x) is equivalent to

\left (-\infty ,0 \right ]\times [0, \infty) but don't know how to find f-1, hinki it is an emppty set

sa1988 said:
f−1f−1
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K