Some confusion regarding nomenclature

Matterwave
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,971
Reaction score
329
Hi guys, I often see the terms: "Outer product", "tensor product", "direct product", and "dyadic product" sometimes used interchangeably...do these 4 terms all mean the same thing, or were they all developed in different fields and some people refer to some as one thing and some as another thing or what? The definition I usually see related to these terms is the creation of a tensor from the product of two vectors. I have heard the terms like this: in Quantum Mechanics when we have a composite state, we take the "tensor product" of two individual states which live in different Hilbert Spaces, in the E.M. Energy Stress Tensor, the Maxwell stress tensor involves the "dyadic product" of the Electric field with itself, etc. What's the deal?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm unfamiliar with the direct product, but these explain the relations between the rest...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_product"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_product"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyadic_product"
If these are unclear, please ask a specific question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
341
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top