Some Weird Questions On Aerodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the aerodynamics of throwing a 10 lb human head compared to a 10 lb round rock using a constant force machine. Participants agree that while both objects could be thrown the same distance under ideal conditions, the human head would likely experience more air drag due to its shape, resulting in shorter distances in practical scenarios. The conversation also touches on variables like hair length and head shape, suggesting that these factors could influence aerodynamics. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the round rock being more aerodynamically efficient than a human head. The thread humorously concludes with a nod to Halloween as a playful context for testing these theories.
TheAzn
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Sorry for this weird thread.

Say that you throw a perfectly round 10 lb stone rock using a machine with constant force and distance of propulsion.

Can a 10 lb ("average") human head,with full hair about 2 inches long, be thrown -using the same machine - just as far as the 10 lb rock?

How about a 10 lb human head with a shaved head?

Again, I apologize for these weird questions. It's just that I was arguing with someone and this topic came up. My position was that a human head is not really aerodynamically efficient, and will fall far short behind the perfectly round 10 lb rock.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is weird.
For a minute there I thought you meant a 10 pound human head of size 2 inches, in which case there might not be on PF an expert in shrunken heads but you never know.

If your machine throws your bowling ball rock 10 feet, then it would necessarily throw the human head 10 feet also

As the distance of throw increases, the velocity of ejection also increases, and so does the air drag. I would again assume the human head would have more drag then a bowling ball, so the bowling ball wins the toss contest and gets the gold.

The hairy head would get bronze and the bald one silver.

Then again, are these pointy heads shaped like a bullet in which case all bets are off.
 
on the other hand the dimples on a golf ball make it go further. So it's not totally inconceivable that the "head" might go further at high enough velocities (and perhaps with a bit of spin).

There is only one way to find out and halloween is coming soon :-)
 
CWatters said:
There is only one way to find out and halloween is coming soon :-)

That is true :D
 
Are you planning to storm a castle soon or something?

Just in general, a human head will use more drag than an equivalently sized spherical object so you would likely need more throwing power. Put a bigger counterweight on that trebuchet!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top