Sonometers, tuning forks, and wave periodicity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding wave behavior on a sonometer, particularly regarding the distinction between periodic waves and pulse waves. A tuning fork is typically used to identify the wave frequency of the sonometer, which primarily resonates at a single frequency. It is noted that pulse waves consist of a range of frequencies, leading to dispersion and a loss of shape, making them less suitable for analysis with a sonometer. The conversation also touches on the assumptions needed for wave calculations, emphasizing that standing waves are more relevant in this context than pulse transmission. Ultimately, the participants seek clarity on the relationship between wave frequency, wavelength, and the nature of waves on the sonometer.
Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Summary: Cofnusion regarding waves on a sonometer band

A tuning fork is used to determine the wave frequency of a sonometer(according to my understanding), so whay about pulse waves? Does a pulse have a wave frequency? Couldn't a pulse travel over the sonometer band that can be determined by a tuning fork? Or are all waves that travel through a sonometer periodic? That makes me wonder when I can use the relation that says the velocity of a wave is equal to its wavelength multiplies by its frequency, is it also for periodic wavea only? I think it's obvious that I'm a bit confused, can someone hall clarify those things to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahmed1029 said:
Summary: Cofnusion regarding waves on a sonometer band

so whay about pulse waves?
It depends on what experiment you have in mind. The basis of a sonometer is to resonate with a single driving frequency, afaik. I think you'd only be using fundamental or low overtones because a pulse consists of a range of frequencies and would disperse and the shape would be destroyed pretty quickly.
If you want to look at pulses on a string, I'd suggest you use a very long string and a sensor at different points along the string - different equipment needed.
 
sophiecentaur said:
It depends on what experiment you have in mind. The basis of a sonometer is to resonate with a single driving frequency, afaik. I think you'd only be using fundamental or low overtones because a pulse consists of a range of frequencies and would disperse and the shape would be destroyed pretty quickly.
If you want to look at pulses on a string, I'd suggest you use a very long string and a sensor at different points along the string - different equipment needed.
So if there is no dispersion, can I always assume the wave traveling through the sonometer band is periodic and has a well-defined wavelength and time period?
 
Ahmed1029 said:
So if there is no dispersion, can I always assume the wave traveling through the sonometer band is periodic and has a well-defined wavelength and time period?
You can't rely on no dispersion. How do you propose to launch a pulse onto the wire? Post a diagram of what you hope to do.
If you are just trying to think outside the box then ask yourself how a pulse can be generated and detected. The sonometer is essential a resonant instrument with standing waves. This is not consistent with pulse transmission along a wire which requires a long wire with a transducer at one end, a long wire and a transducer at the other end which will absorb all the incident wave energy and suppress any reflection.
 
IMG_٢٠٢٢٠٩٢٤_٠٠٤٢٣٦.jpg
Screenshot_2022-09-24-00-42-09-89_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg

I'm just trying to solve this problem. Here m is the mass of the block, not the sonometer band. I'n supposed to get a number, but I keep getting an equation with 2 constants, one of which is linear mass density( which I want to find), while the other is wavelegnth. I made an assumption that the wave was periodic in soace and time, and that its frequency is the same as the frequency of the sound waves it produced. I'm not sure of any of those two assumption, and even when making them J still can't figure out the solution. Any insight?
Here is my attempt :
IMG20220924005205.jpg
 
I think you can assume that the sonometer wire vibrates as a standing wave in the fundamental mode. Do you see how to determine the wavelength of the standing wave in terms of the distance ##l##?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top