Space-Time Distortion: Matterless Vacuums in Space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JDude13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacecraft Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of space-time distortion in the context of a spacecraft containing a perfect vacuum moving at relativistic speeds. Participants explore the implications of having no matter inside the spacecraft and whether space itself can exist or be affected without the presence of mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether space is irrelevant without matter, specifically in the context of a spacecraft moving at 0.9c.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that a spacecraft would distort spacetime, asking if it needs to be extremely massive like a planet.
  • It is proposed that nothing happens to the space inside the ship because it moves with the ship, and that space exists even without mass.
  • A participant notes that a very small mass can still distort spacetime, albeit minimally, and questions the relevance of discussing a vacuum-filled spaceship instead of a planet with a hollow center.
  • The original poster seeks to understand if space exists without matter and whether the space inside a spaceship contracts in the absence of particles.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between proximity to a moving body and length contraction, asserting that length contraction is determined by reference frames rather than the presence of matter within those frames.
  • It is clarified that the diameter of an object, such as a ping-pong ball, is length contracted from a moving reference frame, regardless of the motion of the ship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of space without matter, the conditions under which spacetime is distorted, and the implications of length contraction. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached consensus on the fundamental nature of space in the absence of matter, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the effects of relativistic speeds on objects within a vacuum.

JDude13
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Imagine a spacecraft containing a perfect vacuum, hurtling through space at 0.9c.
This movement distorts the space the matter of the ship occupies. But what happens to the space inside the ship? It contains no matter. Is space irrelevant without matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Are you imagining a spacecraft that is extremely massive like a planet? Why would the spacecraft distort spacetime?
 


Nothing happens to the space inside the ship because it is moving with the ship. Yes, there is space even when there is no mass.

DaleSpam- even a very small mass will "distort" spacetime- a small amount.
 


True, but either you need a really massive ship or some incredibly sensitive detectors, which we don't usually assume in these kinds of problems.

I am just trying to understand the OP's question better. Why talk about a spaceship containing vacuum rather than a planet with a hollow vacuum-filled center? I think that JDude13 is asking something different than most posters with similar questions, but I am not sure exactly what.
 


My question is about whether or not space exists without matter for it to manipulate.
Does the space inside a regular spaceship contract when there are no particles?
Alternately, imagine a ping-pong ball floating inside the spaceship before it accelerates rapidly. Is the ping-pong ball affected by length contraction because of its proximity to a moving body? Or will we only observe the ball's relativistic behavior once it makes contact with the inside of the ship and accelerates?
 


What does proximity to a moving body have to do with length contraction?

In one reference frame the lengths determined in a moving reference frame are contracted regardless of whether or not there is something moving or at rest in either frame. Length contraction is about relatively moving reference frames, not moving objects.

If the ping pong ball is analyzed from a frame where it is moving then it's diameter is length contracted, regardless of the motion of the ship. If the ping pong ball is analyzed from a frame where it is stationary then it's diameter is not length contracted, regardless of the motion of the ship. The ship is a red herring.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K