Space-Time Warping Imaging at 1T fps - Ramesh Raskar

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsmikk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time
dsmikk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Imaging at a Trillion Frame Per Second - Ramesh Raskar

http://www.ted.com/talks/ramesh_raskar_a_camera_that_takes_one_trillion_frames_per_second.html

Although this video is extremely interesting, The part I'm most interested in occurs at about the 9:30 mark.


Ramesh Raskar says,

"But there is also something funny going on here .. the ripple are moving away from the camera towards the cap of the bottle when we know that light should be moving from cap to the camera?
Well Einstein would have loved to see this femto-photo.
It turns out that because we are recording nearly at the speed of light, there is reversal in how we observe events in the world. After a correct mathematical space-time warp, we can correct for this time distortion."

So my question is, why do we observe a reversal in the events when photographing at almost the speed of light? I may be overthinking, but I'm curious and was wondering if anybody had an explantation. Thanks in advance for any responses!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A photo is the collection of all light that reaches the camera at a specific point (better: very short interval) in time. It is not a collection of all light emitted at a specific time.

For regular photos, this does not make a difference, as the time needed from emitter to camera is negligible. For those high-speed videos, the effect is relevant. To determine the frame where the camera will see light somewhere, you have to add the length between light source and this point and the length between this point and the camera.

This does not have to lead to a "reversal", but it leads to significant effects on the images.
 
mfb said:
For regular photos, this does not make a difference, as the time needed from emitter to camera is negligible. For those high-speed videos, the effect is relevant. To determine the frame where the camera will see light somewhere, you have to add the length between light source and this point and the length between this point and the camera.

Ahh that makes more sense now. I was definitely overthinking the process. Thanks
 
dsmikk said:
I was definitely overthinking the process. Thanks
Or the guy was over-explaining the issue.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top