I Spatially Homogeneous Scalar Field on Spacetime: Showing $\nabla^2 f$

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
For a spatially homogeneous scalar field f on the given spacetime, it is established that the Laplacian operator yields the result ∇²f = 𝑓̈ + 3H𝑓̇. The condition of spatial homogeneity implies that f is solely a function of time, eliminating spatial derivatives. The derivation involves applying the covariant Laplacian and recognizing that only time derivatives remain due to the lack of spatial dependence. The appropriate trace of the Christoffel symbols is crucial in simplifying the expression. This leads to the conclusion that the dynamics of f are governed by its time evolution and the expansion rate H.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
If ##f## is a "spatially homogeneous" scalar field on spacetime ##ds^2 = dt^2 - a^2(t) \delta_{ij} dx^i dx^j## then show that ##\nabla^2 f = \ddot{f} + 3H \dot{f}##. Should be easy if I knew what the condition on ##f## is, i.e. ##\nabla^2 f = \partial_{\mu} \partial^{\mu} f = \ddot{f}- a^{-2}(t) \delta^{ij} \partial_i \partial_j f = \dots##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spatially homogeneous = does not depend on spatial position. In other words, ##f## is a function of ##t## only.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker, vanhees71 and ergospherical
I messed up the double covariant, should be:\begin{align*}
\nabla^2 f &= \nabla_{\mu}(\partial^{\mu} f) \\
&= \partial_{\mu} \partial^{\mu} f + g^{\nu \rho} \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^{\mu} \partial_{\rho} f \\
&= \partial_t^2 f + 3H \partial_t f
\end{align*}(##\Gamma_{0i}^{j} = H\delta^{j}_{i}##)
 
Indeed. Only the time derivatives survive since the field only depends on t. Then it is just a matter of finding the appropriate trace of Christoffel symbols.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
372
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
957