Spatially Homogeneous Scalar Field on Spacetime: Showing $\nabla^2 f$

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical expression for the Laplacian of a spatially homogeneous scalar field in a specific spacetime metric. Participants explore the implications of spatial homogeneity on the derivatives of the scalar field, particularly focusing on the relationship between the second derivatives and the Hubble parameter.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant poses the problem of showing that ##\nabla^2 f = \ddot{f} + 3H \dot{f}## for a spatially homogeneous scalar field, questioning the conditions on ##f##.
  • Another participant clarifies that "spatially homogeneous" means that ##f## does not depend on spatial position, implying that it is a function of time only.
  • A participant corrects their earlier statement regarding the covariant derivatives and presents the expression for the Laplacian, including terms involving the Christoffel symbols and the Hubble parameter.
  • It is noted that only time derivatives remain relevant due to the dependence of the field solely on time, leading to a focus on the trace of the Christoffel symbols.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the definition of spatial homogeneity and the implications for the derivatives of the scalar field, but the discussion remains technical and exploratory without a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the implications of the Christoffel symbols or the specific conditions under which the expression holds, leaving some assumptions and mathematical steps unaddressed.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
If ##f## is a "spatially homogeneous" scalar field on spacetime ##ds^2 = dt^2 - a^2(t) \delta_{ij} dx^i dx^j## then show that ##\nabla^2 f = \ddot{f} + 3H \dot{f}##. Should be easy if I knew what the condition on ##f## is, i.e. ##\nabla^2 f = \partial_{\mu} \partial^{\mu} f = \ddot{f}- a^{-2}(t) \delta^{ij} \partial_i \partial_j f = \dots##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spatially homogeneous = does not depend on spatial position. In other words, ##f## is a function of ##t## only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, vanhees71 and ergospherical
I messed up the double covariant, should be:\begin{align*}
\nabla^2 f &= \nabla_{\mu}(\partial^{\mu} f) \\
&= \partial_{\mu} \partial^{\mu} f + g^{\nu \rho} \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^{\mu} \partial_{\rho} f \\
&= \partial_t^2 f + 3H \partial_t f
\end{align*}(##\Gamma_{0i}^{j} = H\delta^{j}_{i}##)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Indeed. Only the time derivatives survive since the field only depends on t. Then it is just a matter of finding the appropriate trace of Christoffel symbols.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
683
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K