Special relativity inertial reference frames.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of inertial reference frames in the context of special relativity, specifically focusing on two events defined by their space-time coordinates. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating the existence of an inertial frame where these events occur simultaneously and finding the corresponding time in that frame.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Lorentz transformations to find a velocity that results in simultaneous events in another inertial frame. They express concern about not using a given assumption in their calculations. Other participants discuss the validity of the approach and the implications of selecting different signs for the velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the correctness of the original poster's calculations and the implications of their assumptions. Guidance has been offered regarding the nature of solutions and the need to consider both signs of the velocity.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that this problem is for revision and not assessed work, indicating a more open-ended exploration of the concepts involved.

C.E
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
1. Suppose the space time co-ordinates of two events in inertial frame S are as follows:
Event 1:
x1=x0, t1=x0/c y1=z1=0
Event 2:
x2=2x0, t2= x0/2c y2=z2=0
Show that there exists an inertial frame s' in which these events occur at the same time (i.e t1'=t2') and find the value of time for which these events occur in this reference frame.


2. You may assume that: (Δx)^2+c^2Δt^2=(Δx’)^2 + (Δt’)^2


3. I think I have a solution but annoyingly have not used the above asssumption which I want to do as it is given in the question. Anyway I did the following:

Firstly I set t1'=t2' from this it follows that γ(x0/c - ux0/c^2)=γ(x0/2c-2ux0/c^2) (by the lorentz x co-ordinate transformations) rearranging gives that u=-0.5c. Indeed u=-0.5c seems to work giving t1'=t2'=√3x0/c. However, I am unhappy with my answer in that firstly I seem to have assumed it rather than proved it and secondly I did not use the above assumption. Any guidance would be very welcome.(By the way this is not assesed work merely revision so feel free to give as much help as you deem appropriate).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Finding a solution is certainly a valid approach to solving a problem of the nature "show that a solution exists ...".
 
So, do you think what I have done is correct?
 
I am finding gamma correctly but as it depends only on u^2 and not on the sign of u, u=0.5c or u=-0.5c (by taking positive or negative square roots in finding u from gamma), in selecting 0.5c I clearly chose the wrong option. Anyway how could I know that I should have selected u=-0.5c and not 0.5c? Do you just have to try both and see what works?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K