Special relativity particle observation puzzle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a special relativity puzzle involving two particles that are initially at rest and separated by a distance L. The particles begin to uniformly accelerate and the implications of their separation during and after the acceleration process are explored. The scope includes theoretical considerations of relativity, simultaneity, and the effects of acceleration on observed distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the initial setup where two particles accelerate uniformly and questions the implications of their separation as observed in different frames.
  • Another participant suggests that the relativity of simultaneity plays a crucial role, indicating that the particles would not experience simultaneous acceleration in all frames, leading to a changing distance between them.
  • A different perspective highlights the gravitational effects perceived by the trailing particle, suggesting that it would observe the leading particle's clock running faster due to gravitational time dilation, which would affect the perceived distance over time.
  • One participant references Bell's spaceship paradox, noting that if the particles are to maintain a constant distance, the leading particle must have a lower proper acceleration than the trailing particle, leading to a discussion of modified scenarios where they can maintain constant separation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the acceleration on the separation of the particles, with no consensus reached on the overall interpretation of the scenario or the effects of acceleration and simultaneity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific conditions under which the particles might maintain a constant distance, as well as the complexities introduced by different frames of reference and the nature of acceleration. The implications of gravitational effects and time dilation are also noted but remain unresolved.

StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
Here's a little special relativity puzzle that I found interesting.

Say we have two particles initially at rest in a frame O and separated by a distance L. They begin to uniformly accelerate at t=0 in a direction along the line separating them, until they reach a velocity v at some time t, and then return to inertial motion. Say the first particle follows a path x(t) in O. Then since both particles undergo the same motion, the second particle follows the path x(t)+L. Thus at any time, the distance measured in O between the two particles is L. But this means that in the final rest frame of the particles, the separation has expanded to [itex]\gamma[/itex] L. What's going on? What happens to the separation as observed by the two particles during this process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StatusX said:
Here's a little special relativity puzzle that I found interesting.

Say we have two particles initially at rest in a frame O and separated by a distance L. They begin to uniformly accelerate at t=0 in a direction along the line separating them, until they reach a velocity v at some time t, and then return to inertial motion. Say the first particle follows a path x(t) in O. Then since both particles undergo the same motion, the second particle follows the path x(t)+L. Thus at any time, the distance measured in O between the two particles is L. But this means that in the final rest frame of the particles, the separation has expanded to [itex]\gamma[/itex] L. What's going on? What happens to the separation as observed by the two particles during this process?
I think the answer would have to do with the relativity of simultaneity--if they both start and stop accelerating simultaneously in O, then in any other inertial frame, they started accelerating at different moments and stopped accelerating at different moments, so the distance between them would be constantly changing.
 
That's true, but a little more analysis shows an interesting effect. Consider what the separation the particles observe during their acceleration.
 
StatusX said:
Here's a little special relativity puzzle that I found interesting.

Say we have two particles initially at rest in a frame O and separated by a distance L. They begin to uniformly accelerate at t=0 in a direction along the line separating them, until they reach a velocity v at some time t, and then return to inertial motion. Say the first particle follows a path x(t) in O. Then since both particles undergo the same motion, the second particle follows the path x(t)+L. Thus at any time, the distance measured in O between the two particles is L. But this means that in the final rest frame of the particles, the separation has expanded to [itex]\gamma[/itex] L. What's going on? What happens to the separation as observed by the two particles during this process?

As observed in the reference frame of the trailing particle, assumed for simplicity to be accelerating uniformly, will reckon the leading particle to be higher up in a gravitational field, i.e. the one produced by acceleration. The leading particle in this accelerating frame will be reckoned, due to gravitational time dilation, to having his clock to be running at a higher rate as reckoned by the trailing particle. Thus in the rest frame of the trailing particle the leading particle will be measured to be accelerating in the trailing particle's rest frame and thus the distance measured in that frame will be an increasing function of time.

Pete
 
StatusX said:
Here's a little special relativity puzzle that I found interesting.

Say we have two particles initially at rest in a frame O and separated by a distance L. They begin to uniformly accelerate at t=0 in a direction along the line separating them, until they reach a velocity v at some time t, and then return to inertial motion.

Assuming that t=0 is defined in frame O, this is known as Bell's spaceship paradox.

see for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bell's_spaceship_paradox&oldid=140470138
http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/spaceship_puzzle.html The two particles do in fact separate as measured in their own frame. If one desires the particles to maintain a constant distance ('Born rigid motion'), the lead particle must have a lower proper acceleration than the trailing particle.

In the modified version, the lead particle accelerates for a longer proper time at a lower acceleration, winding up with the same velocity as the tailing particle.

In this modified version, the lead particle maintains a constant proper distance from the trailing particle, and they both maintain a constant proper distance from some particular "pivot point".

In the unmodified problem, the particles separate.

See also "Born rigid motion"

on the WWW for example
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath422/kmath422.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K