[Special Relativity]Slow Neutron Capture

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in special relativity involving the capture of a slow neutron by a helium-3 nucleus, resulting in the formation of a helium-4 nucleus and the emission of a gamma-ray. Participants are tasked with determining the energy of the gamma-ray in the laboratory frame, considering both conservation of energy and momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore classical and relativistic approaches to solve the problem, questioning the role of relativity in the calculations. Some express uncertainty about the initial velocities and the implications of treating the neutron as non-relativistic.

Discussion Status

Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of conservation laws and the implications of mass-energy equivalence. Participants are encouraged to verify assumptions about the kinetic energy of the helium-4 nucleus and to consider the relativistic aspects of the problem more thoroughly.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the lack of initial velocity information for the neutron and the recoil velocity of the helium-4 nucleus, which complicates the application of conservation principles. Additionally, participants are reminded of the expectations for rigor in their answers as they progress in their studies.

ajclarke
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A helium-4 nucleus (rest mass 4.00151 u) is formed when a helium-3 nucleus (rest mass 3.01493 u), stationary in the laboratory frame, captures a slow neutron (rest mass 1.00867 u), in the following reaction.
3He+n→4 He+γ
Determine the energy (in MeV) of the γ-ray in the laboratory frame. (1 u ≡ 1.66 × 10−27 kg.)


Homework Equations



Given Above

The Attempt at a Solution



As far as I can see classically this would be a doddle. With Conservation of Energy and momentum to be taken into consideration before and after. However without the initial velocities of the neutron or the recoil velocity of the He-4 Nucleus I am not sure how to calculate the energy of the gamma ray. I'm also pretty unsure where the relativity comes into this.

The neutron is slow, so not traveling relativistically, the initial nucleus is at rest. The gamme ray will travel at c, which makes it a pain all in all that i can tell since working out the Lorentz factor is impossible when V=C.

Thanks for any input.
Adam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The slow neutron is essentially at rest. In other words, its kinetic energy is negligible compared to its rest energy. You can assume the He-4 nucleus moves non-relativistically and solve for the energy of the photon. Then go back and check if the He-4 nucleus does indeed move non-relativistically.

If that dubious sort of logic doesn't sit well with you, you can solve the relativistic conservation of energy and momentum equations simultaneously. If you go with this approach and it's not working out for you, post your work here so we can see where you're getting stuck.
 
Thanks for your help. This way my attempt:

Considering Consv. of E

E_{n}+E_{He3}=E_{He4}+_{\gamma}

Since the neutron is a slow neutron its Kinetic Energy is negligable compared with its rest energy. Hence:

E_{n}=m_{n}*c^{2}
E_{He3}=m_{He3}*c^{2}
E_{He4}=m_{He4}*c^{2}
E_{\gamma}=Unknown

Thus:

E_{\gamma}=m_{n}*c^{2}+m_{He3}*c^{2}-m_{He4}*c^{2}

=c^{2}*u(1.00867+3.01493-4.00151)
=c^{2}*u(0.02209)

Therefore:

E_{\gamma}=3e8*1.66e-27*0.02209 = 1.1e-20 J

My issue with this is, there is no relativity involved. I have treated it purely classically, but since nothing but the gamma-ray is traveling relativistically I don't understand my mistakes.

Thanks again for any input.

P.S The powers are meant to be subscripts, for some reasons the latex _{blah-de-blah} command isn't working. Apologies
 
When you used E=mc2, you used relativity. What you found was that some rest mass disappeared in creating He-4, and the missing mass was converted to the energy of the photon. The concept that mass and energy are equivalent is not part of Newtonian physics.

You forgot to square c when calculating the energy of the photon, and you should verify that your answer is consistent with the assumption that the kinetic energy of He4 is negligible. (Find its momentum and use that to calculate its kinetic energy.)
 
Oh why thank you, I had not noticed that I had only used c.
And thanks for the input. Being 3rd Year now they expect our answer to have the rigour of textbook apparently, so ill make sure to add some explanation of what you said about mass and energy being equivalent just being a relativistic principle.

Ill also make sure to confirm the negligability of the KE before filling it in.

Thanks again =]]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K