Special relativity: twin paradox

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the twin paradox in special relativity, specifically examining the implications of signal reception between two twins, Dick and Jane, during Dick's journey at relativistic speeds. Participants explore the effects of time dilation and the Doppler effect on the signals exchanged between the twins during both the outward and return trips.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the differing number of signals received by Dick and Jane during their respective journeys, noting that Dick receives 5 signals during the outward trip and 45 during the return trip.
  • Another participant suggests that the time dilation effects should apply consistently, questioning why Jane appears to be moving faster relative to Dick on the return trip.
  • A participant introduces a space-time diagram to illustrate the events and simultaneity from different frames of reference, indicating that signals could be added to the diagram for clarity.
  • There is a discussion about the time it takes for signals to travel, with one participant calculating that Jane would not see Dick's turnaround until 15 years after it occurs, due to the distance involved.
  • Another participant asserts that Jane would perceive Dick traveling 20 light years in just 5 years, prompting further debate about the validity of this statement and the implications of light travel time.
  • A response emphasizes that visual observations do not reflect actual events, suggesting that understanding the sequence of events requires accounting for light travel time and the relativistic effects involved.
  • One participant acknowledges their realization of the complexities involved, indicating a shift in understanding regarding the perceived speeds and distances involved in the scenario.
  • Another participant clarifies that Jane would understand the timing of events based on the light travel time, thus not concluding that Dick exceeded the speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of confusion and understanding regarding the implications of the twin paradox, particularly about the reception of signals and the perception of speed. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the signals and the implications for perceived speeds, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of light travel time in understanding the sequence of events, which complicates the interpretation of simultaneity and perceived speeds. The discussion reflects the nuances of relativistic effects and the challenges in reconciling different frames of reference.

jk4
I am just a little bit unsure about something I read on the "twin paradox".
It talks about Dick and Jane who are twins, each 20yrs old. Dick departs at a speed of 0.80c to a star 20 light years away. So I'm sure you all know how the story goes, Dick is 50yrs old when he returns and Jane is 70.

Ok, then it asks a question:
Dick and Jane each send out a radio signal once a year while Dick is away. How many signals does Dick receive? Hown many does Jane receive? using the same info as above.

I'll leave out a lot of the discussion the book uses and the details, but I'm interested it the fact that the signal rates are different on the return trip then from the outward trip.

Using the doppler effect we find that on the outward trip Dick receives 5 signals from Jane. But, he receives 45 signals from Jane on the return trip.

Now this confuses me because I was under the impression that time would appear to be moving slower for someone moving relative to you regardless of if they are approaching or receding. However, according to this argument, wouldn't it seem that on the return trip that time is moving extremely fast for Jane relative to Dick?

Also, Jane receives 15 signals in 45 years (corresponding to Dicks outward trip), on the return trip Jane receives 15 signals from Dick in the last 5 years of her 50yr wait (the 15 signals Dick sends out on his return), so that means she must see him moving really slow on the outward trip, but then wouldn't it appear to her that he travels 20 light years in just 5 years!

I know I'm wrong because then the theory wouldn't hold, I just want to know what I'm looking at the wrong way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems to be one of those months where half the new threads are about the twin paradox in one way or another.

I made http://web.comhem.se/~u87325397/Twins.PNG space-time diagram for a discussion on another forum. I didn't draw any radio signals, but it would be easy to add them. They would be lines at a 45 degree angle with the time and space axes. Note that if you send a radio signal from Earth that arrives to the rocket at the turnaround event, it would have to be emitted very early.

I'm calling the twin on Earth "A" and the twin in the rocket "B".
Blue lines: Events that are simultaneous in the rocket's frame when it's moving away from Earth.
Red lines: Events that are simultaneous in the rocket's frame when it's moving back towards Earth.
Cyan (light blue) lines: Events that are simultaneous in Earth's frame.
Dotted lines: World lines of light rays.
Vertical line in the upper half: The world line of the position (in Earth's frame) where the rocket turns around.
Green curves in the lower half: Curves of constant -t2+x2. Points on the two world lines that touch the same green curve have experienced the same time since the rocket left Earth.
Green curves in the upper half: Curves of constant -(t-20)2+(x-16)2. Points on the two world lines that touch the same green curve have experienced the same time since the rocket turned around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I understand most of the image. However, wouldn't A not see B's rocket turn around until about 15 years after it happens? because there is about a 15 light year difference in their positions.
 
so??
 
well then that means that A would see B's entire homeward journey in just a few years, like in my original post. Wouldn't Jane see Dick travel 20light years in just 5 years? Which is impossible of course... That's what I'm confused about. Is that statement correct? Jane would see Dick travel 20 light years in just 5 years. Or is that statement false? That's my question, and if it's false, why? I just assumed it was false and that I'm misunderstanding something because he can't travel faster than light.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't matter what people see. If you hook up a video camera to a telescope, it would "see" something, but that obviously isn't what's actually happening. If you want to see what really happened you'd have to have a computer show the pictures to you at a rate that compensates for the arrival times of the light.

And if you just imagine a few lines at a 45 degree angle in my diagram, you should understand why Jane would see Dick travel a pretty short distance during the first half of her time, but she should know that that's not what's actually happening.
 
wow, so I was right after all. Thank you all for helping me realize that, or I would have spent a long time thinking I was missing something vital.
 
jk4 said:
...

Also, Jane receives 15 signals in 45 years (corresponding to Dicks outward trip), on the return trip Jane receives 15 signals from Dick in the last 5 years of her 50yr wait (the 15 signals Dick sends out on his return), so that means she must see him moving really slow on the outward trip, but then wouldn't it appear to her that he travels 20 light years in just 5 years!
...

Jane is 65 when she sees Dick turn around. Since Dick is 20 light years away at the turn around event Jane realizes she is seeing an event (the turnaround) that happened 20 years earlier due to light travel time. So when Dick arrives 5 years later after Jane seeing the turnaround event she knows the interval between trunaround and arrival is 25 years of her time so she has no reason to think Dick has been exceeding the speed of light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K