Specific latent heat of fusion lab

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a lab experiment aimed at determining the specific latent heat of fusion of ice using the method of mixtures. Participants are analyzing their results and equations related to heat transfer between water and ice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the specific latent heat of fusion using heat transfer equations. There is a discussion about the validity of using different specific heat capacities in calculations, particularly questioning the use of the specific heat of water versus that of ice. Concerns are raised about discrepancies in results and potential errors in experimental setup.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the need to account for additional factors, such as the heat gained by the beaker. There is an acknowledgment of possible errors in observations, and suggestions to repeat the experiment have been made. Multiple interpretations of the equations and results are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of insulation during the experiment and the potential impact of heat loss to the surroundings on their results. There is also mention of specific heat values relevant to the materials involved in the experiment.

Boogeyman
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It's part of a lab designed to find the specific latent heat of fusion of ice using the method of mixtures. The results are in the 1st attachment..I want to find the specific latent heat of fusion of ice from those nos.

Homework Equations



heat lost by water = heat gained by ice + heat required to melt ice

The Attempt at a Solution


mwcw([tex]\theta<sub>i</sub>[/tex]) - ([tex]\theta<sub>f</sub>[/tex] - mici([tex]\theta<sub>i</sub>[/tex] - 0) + milf

lf = mwcw ([tex]\theta<sub>i</sub>[/tex] - [tex]\theta<sub>f</sub>[/tex]) - mici([tex]\theta<sub>i</sub>[/tex] - 0) / mi

I don't know how to fix this cursed code...anyways this is the equation I come up with. My friend in his attempt, (2nd attachment), got something different. I also found if you used cw instead of ci at the end of the last eqn you got the precise value of the specific latent heat of fusion of ice.
 

Attachments

  • results.jpg
    results.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 1,157
  • vir's calc.jpg
    vir's calc.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 1,259
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I also found if you used cw instead of ci at the end of the last eqn you got the precise value of the specific latent heat of fusion of ice.

If the ice is at zero degree celsius you can use cw in place of ci.
 
If the ice is at zero degree celsius you can use cw in place of ci.

Ok could you explain why that is so, because as far as I know you would get different answers..btw when I worked it out yesterday I got 4.85x105Jkg-1

This is what, like more than 100 000 off the correct answer. Now I didn't use any insulation material during the experiment..can my answer be off by so much because of heat lost to surroundings?
 
You are doing the experiment in a beaker. So you have to take into account the heat gained by the beaker also. The spacific heat of the glass is 840 J/kg .degree. Then the answer is still more. So you have made some error in the observations. Do it again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K