Speed, mass increase & outside observers.

AI Thread Summary
In a hypothetical scenario where a spacecraft is isolated from other bodies, the occupant perceives themselves as stationary, measuring light speed consistently at 300,000 kps. Upon accelerating towards light speed, the occupant experiences no change in mass or speed within their frame of reference, leading to the question of whether mass can be said to increase without an external observer. An outside observer would measure the craft's mass as approaching infinity, but the lack of external reference means the occupant cannot confirm any change. The discussion raises the paradox of motion and mass perception in the absence of observable bodies, questioning the validity of increased mass when no external frame exists. Ultimately, the occupant remains unaware of any change, challenging conventional understandings of speed and mass in relativity.
Endervhar
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Imagine you are in your spacecraft , and within your observable universe there is no other body. As far as you are aware, you are stationary. If you shine a light inside your craft you will measure its speed as 300,000kps, as you also will if you shine a light outside the craft. Nothing gives you any information about your possible state of motion, so you are quite justified in thinking that you are at rest. Now, if you accelerate your craft so that your instruments tell you that you are traveling at approaching the speed of light, what happens to the mass of your craft? You will be aware of no change, if you were, you would know that you were in motion. If there were an outside observer, she would measure your craft’s mass as approaching infinity as you neared light speed, but there is no external observer, and in your frame of reference nothing has changed. As there is no-one in whose frame of reference your craft’s mass has increased, can it, in fact, be said to have increased?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Endervhar said:
Imagine you are in your spacecraft , and within your observable universe there is no other body. As far as you are aware, you are stationary. If you shine a light inside your craft you will measure its speed as 300,000kps, as you also will if you shine a light outside the craft. Nothing gives you any information about your possible state of motion, so you are quite justified in thinking that you are at rest. Now, if you accelerate your craft so that your instruments tell you that you are traveling at approaching the speed of light, what happens to the mass of your craft?
Your speed relative to what? Assuming that your craft has external sensors so that for its "observable universe" there are other bodies then it can give your speed relative to one of those bodies. But, of course, it would really tell you that the other bodies are going faster relative to you. From the point of view of the craft, you are still stationary.

You will be aware of no change, if you were, you would know that you were in motion. If there were an outside observer, she would measure your craft’s mass as approaching infinity as you neared light speed, but there is no external observer, and in your frame of reference nothing has changed. As there is no-one in whose frame of reference your craft’s mass has increased, can it, in fact, be said to have increased?
There is absolutely no reason to say it has increased or, in fact, that your speed has changed. Why is that a problem?
 
Even with no other observable body, would you not be aware that you were in motion while you were accelerating?
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Ride Gravitational Waves to Increase Speed?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?
Replies
35
Views
442
I Can Crafts Reach 2c Relative to Me?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Does mass increase as velocity increases?
Replies
6
Views
3K
B Speed of light and this Accelerating Rocket scenario
Replies
45
Views
5K
I Time dilation and the human body
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Can You Become a Black Hole from Approaching Light Speed?
Replies
25
Views
3K
B Thoughts about Galilean transformations
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Mass/Density Increase in Motion: Relativistic or Observable?
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Do Gravitational Forces Increase for Objects Moving at Light Speed?
Replies
16
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top