Speed of an object in a rotating frame

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the measurement of speed for an object moving in a rotating frame, specifically considering a scenario involving a rotating rim and an object moving counter to its rotation. Participants explore the implications of special relativity, time dilation, and the definition of space in rotating frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaningfulness of measuring speed in a rotating frame and proposes three different interpretations of the object's speed based on varying definitions of the rim's circumference.
  • Another participant challenges the comparison made to a Born rigidly accelerating rod, arguing that the clocks on the rim run at the same rate due to their perpendicular separation from the direction of acceleration.
  • A later reply emphasizes the complexity of defining a "rotating frame" and the physical meaning of "space" within that frame, suggesting that the discussion may lead to unresolved issues.
  • One participant introduces the Sagnac effect, suggesting that co- and counter-rotating objects can maintain the same speed and return to their starting point simultaneously, which implies a meaningful measure of distance on the rim.
  • Another participant expresses concern that if a clearly defined physical meaning cannot be assigned to the length of the rim in its own frame, it could indicate a fundamental difference between rotating and inertial objects in special relativity.
  • One participant asserts that the length of the rim measured by rods would be 167, while the radar length in the rotating direction is 375.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the measurement of speed in a rotating frame, the implications of the Ehrenfest Paradox, and the physical meaning of space in such frames. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in defining the "space" in the rotating frame and the implications of time dilation on measurements. The discussion also touches on historical arguments regarding the physical circumference of the rim in different frames, which remain contentious.

  • #31
Great. Plenty to learn here. Thanks PeterDonis, DaleSpam and SlowThinker.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Øyvind Grøn provides further insights and much more in his "Space geometry in rotating reference frames: A historical appraisal" paper.

http://areeweb.polito.it/ricerca/relgrav/solciclos/gron_d.pdf

Grøn's own solution (figure 9.) shows the timings required so that light pulses emitted from each of 16 points along the rolling wheel rim arrive at the same point and time as the last point touches the road. To avoid Born rigidity issues the wheel has no thickness (i.e. x,y, t dimensions with z =0) and the observer is in the same plane of rotation as the relativistically rolling wheel. The results can be easily cross checked as the differences between each emission point time and each respective axle x location should reveal the velocity of the wheel as well as the angular velocity of any point on the rim of that wheel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JVNY
  • #33
Another good (IMO) and recent paper on measuring distances on a rotating platform is "The Relative Space: Space Measurements on a Rotating Platform" http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0309020. The author (Ruggerio) first gives an exact definition of what he means by "the space" of a rotating disk as a quotient manfiold. My inexact intuitive summary of this definition is as follows. If one think of painting a dot on a rotating disk, this dot traces out a worldline in 4-d space-time. The "quotient manifold" is just a mapping from the 4-d worldline to a single point in an abstract 3-d space.

The author then proceeds to demonstrate how operationally by the exchange of light signals an observer at one point in this "relative space" can measure their distance to another nearby point in this "relative space".

The algebra is somewhat messy (not terribly messy, it requires solving a quadratic equation), but the concepts are simple and easily tied to the SI definition of the meter

The meter is the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.


The end result is a non-euclidean geometry (the authors give a specific metric) of the "relative space". References to other papers with similar results via different methods are also given.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JVNY
  • #34
Laurie K said:
Øyvind Grøn provides further insights and much more in his "Space geometry in rotating reference frames: A historical appraisal" paper.

http://areeweb.polito.it/ricerca/relgrav/solciclos/gron_d.pdf

Grøn's own solution (figure 9.) shows the timings required so that light pulses emitted from each of 16 points along the rolling wheel rim arrive at the same point and time as the last point touches the road. To avoid Born rigidity issues the wheel has no thickness (i.e. x,y, t dimensions with z =0) and the observer is in the same plane of rotation as the relativistically rolling wheel. The results can be easily cross checked as the differences between each emission point time and each respective axle x location should reveal the velocity of the wheel as well as the angular velocity of any point on the rim of that wheel.
Thanks very much.
 
  • #35
pervect said:
Another good (IMO) and recent paper on measuring distances on a rotating platform is "The Relative Space: Space Measurements on a Rotating Platform" http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0309020. The author (Ruggerio) first gives an exact definition of what he means by "the space" of a rotating disk as a quotient manfiold. My inexact intuitive summary of this definition is as follows. If one think of painting a dot on a rotating disk, this dot traces out a worldline in 4-d space-time. The "quotient manifold" is just a mapping from the 4-d worldline to a single point in an abstract 3-d space.

The author then proceeds to demonstrate how operationally by the exchange of light signals an observer at one point in this "relative space" can measure their distance to another nearby point in this "relative space".

The algebra is somewhat messy (not terribly messy, it requires solving a quadratic equation), but the concepts are simple and easily tied to the SI definition of the meter
The end result is a non-euclidean geometry (the authors give a specific metric) of the "relative space". References to other papers with similar results via different methods are also given.
Thanks very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K