Speed of an object in a rotating frame

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring the speed of an object in a rotating frame, specifically a rim rotating at 0.8c with an object moving counter-rotationally at the same speed relative to the rim. It highlights the complexities of defining speed and distance in a non-inertial frame, noting that standard clocks on the rim run at the same rate, unlike in a rigidly accelerating rod. The elapsed time for the object to complete a circuit is affected by time dilation, leading to different interpretations of the rim's circumference in various frames. The conversation also touches on the Ehrenfest Paradox and the Sagnac effect, emphasizing the need for a consistent definition of "space" in the rotating frame. Overall, the analysis reveals significant challenges in reconciling measurements and physical meanings in rotating systems.
  • #31
Great. Plenty to learn here. Thanks PeterDonis, DaleSpam and SlowThinker.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Øyvind Grøn provides further insights and much more in his "Space geometry in rotating reference frames: A historical appraisal" paper.

http://areeweb.polito.it/ricerca/relgrav/solciclos/gron_d.pdf

Grøn's own solution (figure 9.) shows the timings required so that light pulses emitted from each of 16 points along the rolling wheel rim arrive at the same point and time as the last point touches the road. To avoid Born rigidity issues the wheel has no thickness (i.e. x,y, t dimensions with z =0) and the observer is in the same plane of rotation as the relativistically rolling wheel. The results can be easily cross checked as the differences between each emission point time and each respective axle x location should reveal the velocity of the wheel as well as the angular velocity of any point on the rim of that wheel.
 
  • Like
Likes JVNY
  • #33
Another good (IMO) and recent paper on measuring distances on a rotating platform is "The Relative Space: Space Measurements on a Rotating Platform" http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0309020. The author (Ruggerio) first gives an exact definition of what he means by "the space" of a rotating disk as a quotient manfiold. My inexact intuitive summary of this definition is as follows. If one think of painting a dot on a rotating disk, this dot traces out a worldline in 4-d space-time. The "quotient manifold" is just a mapping from the 4-d worldline to a single point in an abstract 3-d space.

The author then proceeds to demonstrate how operationally by the exchange of light signals an observer at one point in this "relative space" can measure their distance to another nearby point in this "relative space".

The algebra is somewhat messy (not terribly messy, it requires solving a quadratic equation), but the concepts are simple and easily tied to the SI defintion of the meter

The meter is the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.


The end result is a non-euclidean geometry (the authors give a specific metric) of the "relative space". References to other papers with similar results via different methods are also given.
 
  • Like
Likes JVNY
  • #34
Laurie K said:
Øyvind Grøn provides further insights and much more in his "Space geometry in rotating reference frames: A historical appraisal" paper.

http://areeweb.polito.it/ricerca/relgrav/solciclos/gron_d.pdf

Grøn's own solution (figure 9.) shows the timings required so that light pulses emitted from each of 16 points along the rolling wheel rim arrive at the same point and time as the last point touches the road. To avoid Born rigidity issues the wheel has no thickness (i.e. x,y, t dimensions with z =0) and the observer is in the same plane of rotation as the relativistically rolling wheel. The results can be easily cross checked as the differences between each emission point time and each respective axle x location should reveal the velocity of the wheel as well as the angular velocity of any point on the rim of that wheel.
Thanks very much.
 
  • #35
pervect said:
Another good (IMO) and recent paper on measuring distances on a rotating platform is "The Relative Space: Space Measurements on a Rotating Platform" http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0309020. The author (Ruggerio) first gives an exact definition of what he means by "the space" of a rotating disk as a quotient manfiold. My inexact intuitive summary of this definition is as follows. If one think of painting a dot on a rotating disk, this dot traces out a worldline in 4-d space-time. The "quotient manifold" is just a mapping from the 4-d worldline to a single point in an abstract 3-d space.

The author then proceeds to demonstrate how operationally by the exchange of light signals an observer at one point in this "relative space" can measure their distance to another nearby point in this "relative space".

The algebra is somewhat messy (not terribly messy, it requires solving a quadratic equation), but the concepts are simple and easily tied to the SI defintion of the meter
The end result is a non-euclidean geometry (the authors give a specific metric) of the "relative space". References to other papers with similar results via different methods are also given.
Thanks very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K