Speed of Gravity: Learn What it is and How it Works

In summary, the conversation discusses the speed at which gravitational effects propagate, with the general consensus being that low-amplitude gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, as predicted by general relativity. This is seen as consistent with causality and is supported by experimental evidence, such as the loss of energy from the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar. While there are theories that suggest gravitational waves could propagate at a speed greater than c, these have been refuted and it is difficult to design empirical tests to specifically check for propagation at c. Overall, the speed of light remains the only known and accepted speed at which gravitational disturbances can propagate.
  • #1
xchaos01
10
0
What is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gravity propagates at the speed of light. c.
 
  • #3
FAQ: How fast do changes in the gravitational field propagate?

General relativity predicts that disturbances in the gravitational field propagate as gravitational waves, and that low-amplitude gravitational waves travel at the speed of light. Gravitational waves have never been detected directly, but the loss of energy from the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar has been checked to high precision against GR's predictions of the power emitted in the form of gravitational waves. Therefore it is extremely unlikely that there is anything seriously wrong with general relativity's description of gravitational waves.

Why does it make sense that low-amplitude waves propagate at c? In Newtonian gravity, gravitational effects are assumed to propagate at infinite speed, so that for example the lunar tides correspond at any time to the position of the moon at the same instant. This clearly can't be true in relativity, since simultaneity isn't something that different observers even agree on. Not only should the "speed of gravity" be finite, but it seems implausible that that it would be greater than c; based on symmetry properties of spacetime, one can prove that there must be a maximum speed of cause and effect.[Rindler 1979] Although the argument is only applicable to special relativity, i.e., to a flat spacetime, it seems likely to apply to general relativity as well, at least for low-amplitude waves on a flat background. As early as 1913, before Einstein had even developed the full theory of general relativity, he had carried out calculations in the weak-field limit that showed that gravitational effects should propagate at c. This seems eminently reasonable, since (a) it is likely to be consistent with causality, and (b) G and c are the only constants with units that appear in the field equations, and the only velocity-scale that can be constructed from these two constants is c itself.

High-amplitude gravitational waves need *not* propagate at c. For example, GR predicts that a gravitational-wave pulse propagating on a background of curved spacetime develops a trailing edge that propagates at less than c.[MTW, p. 957] This effect is weak when the amplitude is small or the wavelength is short compared to the scale of the background curvature.

It is difficult to design empirical tests that specifically check propagation at c, independently of the other features of general relativity. The trouble is that although there are other theories of gravity (e.g., Brans-Dicke gravity) that are consistent with all the currently available experimental data, none of them predict that gravitational disturbances propagate at any other speed than c. Without a test theory that predicts a different speed, it becomes essentially impossible to interpret observations so as to extract the speed. In 2003, Fomalont published the results of an exquisitely sensitive test of general relativity using radar astronomy, and these results were consistent with general relativity. Fomalont's co-author, the theorist Kopeikin, interpreted the results as verifying general relativity's prediction of propagation of gravitational disturbances at c. Samuel and Will published refutations showing that Kopeikin's interpretation was mistaken, and that what the experiment really verified was the speed of light, not the speed of gravity.

A kook paper by Van Flandern claiming propagation of gravitational effects at >c has been debunked by Carlip. Van Flandern's analysis also applies to propagation of electromagnetic disturbances, leading to the result that light propagates at >c --- a conclusion that Van Flandern apparently believed until his death in 2010.

Rindler - Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, 1979, p. 51

MTW - Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, Gravitation

Fomalont and Kopeikin - http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302294

Samuel - http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0304006

Will - http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301145

Van Flandern - http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp

Carlip - Physics Letters A 267 (2000) 81, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9909087v2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes TEFLing

What is the speed of gravity?

The speed of gravity is the rate at which gravitational force travels through space. In a vacuum, this speed is equivalent to the speed of light, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second.

How is the speed of gravity measured?

The speed of gravity is not directly measured, but is calculated using the known values of the gravitational constant, the mass of the two objects, and the distance between them. It can also be indirectly measured by observing the effects of gravity on objects or bodies in space.

Does the speed of gravity change?

According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, the speed of gravity is constant and does not change. However, some theories propose that it may be affected by certain conditions, such as the presence of dark matter or the curvature of space-time.

How does the speed of gravity compare to the speed of light?

As mentioned earlier, the speed of gravity is equivalent to the speed of light in a vacuum. This means that both travel at the same speed of approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. However, the two are fundamentally different forces and should not be directly compared.

Why is the speed of gravity important?

The speed of gravity is important because it determines how quickly gravitational force can act on objects in space. This plays a crucial role in understanding the behavior of celestial bodies, the formation of galaxies, and the overall structure of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
971
Replies
9
Views
972
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
999
Back
Top