Speed of Light in Free Space - Einstein's Second Principle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Einstein's second principle of relativity, specifically the constancy of the speed of light in free space and its implications in different media, such as air. Participants explore whether the principle holds true in air and how the speed of light is perceived by different observers under various conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that "free space" refers to a vacuum, where the speed of light is invariant at c.
  • Others argue that in air, the speed of light is affected by the index of refraction, leading to different measured speeds depending on the observer's motion relative to the air.
  • One participant mentions that all observers in the same atmospheric density will agree on their measured speeds of light, while another counters that different observers can measure different speeds due to their relative motion to the air.
  • A later reply introduces a formula for calculating the speed of light in air relative to an observer moving with respect to the air, suggesting that the speed of light is not always c in such scenarios.
  • Some participants clarify that while light always travels at c in a vacuum, it appears to slow down in media due to interactions with the medium's atomic structure.
  • One participant references literature to explain the apparent slowing of light in media, emphasizing the role of re-radiated light from atoms in the medium.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Einstein's principle in air, with no consensus reached on whether the measured speed of light varies for different observers in that medium.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the conditions of the observers and the nature of the medium are not fully explored, leading to varying interpretations of the principle's validity in different contexts.

abdossamad2003
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
hello everyone
According to Einstein's second principle of relativity:
"The principle of the constancy of the speed of light: The speed of light in free space has the same value c in all inertial reference frames"
Does free space mean vacuum? Is this principle not valid in the air and the measured speed of light in air is different from the perspective of each observer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in vacuum.

In air, you have to account for index of refraction
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Dale
"Light in air is 1.0003 times slower than light in a vacuum, which slows it all the way down from 299,792,458 meters per second to 299,702,547 meters per second. "
- Google

abdossamad2003 said:
...and the measured speed of light in air is different from the perspective of each observer?
No. All observers (in the same atmospheric density) will agree on their measured speeds of light.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
DaveC426913 said:
No. All observers (in the same atmospheric density) will agree on their measured speeds of light.
No they won't, because it isn't doing ##c##, not quite. Different observers will, therefore measure different speeds. This includes an observer doing approximately 99.9997c with respect to the atmosphere who will see the light wave as stationary (briefly, before turning into a cloud of plasma due to friction).
abdossamad2003 said:
Is this principle not valid in the air and the measured speed of light in air is different from the perspective of each observer?
The principle always applies - that is, ##c## is always invariant. But light does not always travel at ##c##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
It’s really not about light but about maximum signal speeds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
DaveC426913 said:
abdossamad2003 said:
Is this principle not valid in the air and the measured speed of light in air is different from the perspective of each observer?
No. All observers (in the same atmospheric density) will agree on their measured speeds of light.
Incorrect. The speed of light in air depends on the speed of the air relative to the observer.

For light parallel to the motion of the air, the formula$$\frac{u + v}{1 + uv/c^2}$$applies, where ##u## is the speed of the air relative to the observer, ##v## is the speed of light in air relative to the air (about ##c/1.0003##), and ##c## is the speed of light in vacuum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Sorry. I interpreted the OP's question to mean "all observers" are in the same rest frame of the atmosphere. (Which is a dumb interpretation, since that's a trivial scenario.) :sorry: I did not adequately generalize the scenario.

Others have made a better, more generalized interpretation and provided appropriate explanations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
abdossamad2003 said:
hello everyone
According to Einstein's second principle of relativity:
"The principle of the constancy of the speed of light: The speed of light in free space has the same value c in all inertial reference frames"
Does free space mean vacuum? Is this principle not valid in the air and the measured speed of light in air is different from the perspective of each observer?

That was quite some time ago. Almost 120 years. As far as we know today, as was known in Einstein's time, light in a vacuum travels at speed ##c##. It's the speed ##c## that's invariant.

Anything traveling at any speed less than ##c## could be traveling at different speeds for different observers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Ibix said:
But light does not always travel at c ...
Light “per se” travels always at ##c##.

When light travels through media like water or glass or air, it merely appears to slow down. The apparent slower speed is the result of the superposition of two radiative electric fields: (1) the incoming light, traveling at speed ##c##, and (2) the light re-radiated by the atoms in the medium in the forward direction, traveling at speed ##c##, too. The re-radiated light stems from the oscillating charges driven by the incoming light. The superposition of (1) and (2) shifts the phase of the resulting radiation in a way that would occur if light - so to speak - were genuinely to go slower in media.

To understand how the apparent or effective speed of light in media comes about, I recommend to read chapter 31 “The Origin of the Refractive Index” in “The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume I". On Bruce Sherwood’s homepage (https://brucesherwood.net/) you find an article “Refraction and the speed of light” dealing with this question, too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K