Does the weight of an object affect the speed of ripples in water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leeone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pond Speed
AI Thread Summary
The speed of ripples in water does not depend on the weight of the object thrown in, but rather on the properties of the water itself. When a stone is tossed, it creates a wave packet that travels at a speed determined by the water's characteristics, with the individual wave peaks moving faster than the packet. Larger stones increase the amplitude of the waves but do not significantly alter their speed. The dispersive nature of water means that wave speed can vary with frequency, causing some slowing as the wave packet stretches. Understanding wave behavior in water involves complex mathematics, highlighting the intricacies of wave dynamics.
leeone
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Do the speed of the ripples, or waves, in a pond depend on the weight of the pebble thrown into the water? I would think the answer is no since it should only depend on the properties of the water. Similarly if you take a rope and jerk it violently (more force) compared to softly (less force) and the rope has a fixed tension...the wave would have the same speed in both cases, no?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you toss a stone into the pond you then see a wave "packet" that moves out with speed v_pack. This wave packet is as per the attached image. The peaks of the waves inside the wave packet all move with the same speed that is twice as fast as the packet itself v_waves = 2 * v_pack. Notice how the waves inside the packet are small at the ends of the packet and large in the middle. This explains why, when sitting on the dock of a lake and a boat goes by, the noise of the waves hitting the dock start soft build up loudly and then goes soft again.

Dropping a bigger stone into the water will only make the amplitudes of the waves larger. However, because water is a dispersive medium (due to the viscosity and imperfections of the water) the speed of the wave will depend on its frequency and will slow down a bit as the envelope stretches (like someone pulling it apart at both end).

Ya waves are very hard to pin down and, although look quite graceful, the mathematics can be tough.
 

Attachments

  • wave_packet.gif
    wave_packet.gif
    5.7 KB · Views: 576
Okay that answers my question. Thank you.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top