Speed, Velocity, Displacement & Acceleration: An Honors Physics Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of speed, velocity, displacement, and acceleration in the context of an honors physics class. Participants are exploring the differences between average and instantaneous speed, as well as the relationship between velocity and acceleration. Additionally, there is confusion regarding displacement vectors and resultant vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the definitions and relationships between average speed, instantaneous speed, average velocity, and instantaneous velocity. Questions are raised about the implications of constant velocity on acceleration and the differences between displacement and resultant vectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants providing insights and definitions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the mathematical relationships involved, though there is still uncertainty and differing interpretations about the concepts being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the application of formulas and the definitions of terms, indicating a need for further exploration of these concepts. There is also mention of calculus in relation to instantaneous values, suggesting a level of complexity in the discussion.

bjr_jyd15
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm in an honors physics class. I don't really understand the difference between average speed and instantaneous speed. Say I'm given in data table with time (s) and distance (m). How can I find each of these? Is there a formula?

Also, what is the relationship of velocity with acceleration? My teacher said constant velocity means no acceleration? I'm not sure that makes sense?!

One more thing: What is the difference between displacement vectors and resultant vectors? I seem to be stuck. I know for one you just add the magnitudes but for the other it's pythagorean.

Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Average velocity is the velocity between two points in time the slope of a line between those two points), instantaneous velocity is the speed at one point (this is found by calculus and the derivative usually, it's the slope at that point).
Acceleration is the change in velocity over time therefore for an unchanging velocity you get nothing divided by time so acceleration is nothing.
 
Average speed is the total distance traversed divided by the total time required to get there.

Instantaneous speed is the speed at an instant in time and can be viewed as the distance traversed divided by the traversal time as the traversal time is made arbitrarily small. It can be written as a derivative.

In particular, velocity is a vector quantity
\vec v = \frac {d \vec x}{dt}
where \vec x is the (vector) displacement.

A displacement vector is a vector describing the difference in location from one point to another. A resultant vector is a vector that results from adding or subtracting vectors. A resultant vector can also be a displacement vector.
 
Ba said:
Average velocity is the velocity between two points in time the slope of a line between those two points), instantaneous velocity is the speed at one point (this is found by calculus and the derivative usually, it's the slope at that point).
Acceleration is the change in velocity over time therefore for an unchanging velocity you get nothing divided by time so acceleration is nothing.

For consistency with your discussion of average-velocity and instantaneous-velocity, you should really say "average-Acceleration is the change in velocity over time". Instantaneous-acceleration is the acceleration at one point (found by calculus using the derivative...it's the slope at that point [on a velocity-vs-time graph])".
 
So when finding change in distance I should use displacement vectors right? If so , then when are resultant vectors ever useful?

Thanks.
 
I'm not sure how to phrase it, but resultant vectors can also be used to find out the net velocity of an object if it is being influenced by more than two different velocities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
884
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K