Speed with constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the formula v^2 = v0^2 + 2a(x - x0), which describes speed in the context of uniformly accelerated motion. It clarifies that v^2 represents the square of speed, while speed itself is the square root of this value. Participants note that the formula is more about the relationship between variables rather than solely calculating speed. The preference for using v^2 over the square root for simplicity is also mentioned. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the context of the equations in physics.
ahuebel
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Using a Newton equation for position and substituting (v-v0)/a for t you can get the following formula:
v^2= v0^2+2a(x-x0) where v^2 is supposedly speed. I understood speed to be tha magnitude of velocity which is the sqrt of the sum of the squares of the components (i.e. sqrt(vx^2+vy^2+vz^2)). I seem to be missing something... how is speed then v^2? I am sure it is right in front of my face but I am just not seeing it.

TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v^2 is the speed squared; v is the speed.

Realize that your formula ,v^2= v0^2+2a(x-x0), is for uniformly accelerated straight-line motion.
 
Thank you. It just seems odd that if they would state that an equation is speed as a fucnction of position it would be much better to have that equation be v = sqrt(v0^2+2a(x-x0)). It can throw simple people like me off :).
 
Think of that equation as a relationship among all the different variables, not just as a formula for finding speed. Depending upon what information is given, you may wish to use it to solve for any of the variables. (And having a single v^2 is much nicer looking than that ugly square root! :smile: )
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top