Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Spherical harmonics and wavefunctions

  1. Feb 14, 2012 #1
    What's the difference in the representation of spherical harmonics and the orbitals themselves? they look exactly the same to me... unlike the radial part of the wavefunction though.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 14, 2012 #2

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The angular part of an orbital wave function for hydrogen (or any other spherically symmetric potential) is a spherical harmonic:

    [tex]\Psi_{nlm}(r,\theta,\phi) = R_{nl}(r)Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)[/tex]
     
  4. Feb 14, 2012 #3
    yes but for a 2p for example, what's the difference in representation between the orbital itself and the spherical harmonic? they look the same to me.
     
  5. Feb 14, 2012 #4

    cgk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The angular parts look the same, because they are identical (see jtbell's comment). Unlike spherical harmonics, orbital wave functions, however, do not consist only of an angular part. They also have a radial part. And this radial part is non-trival and comes from solving the Schroedinger equation for some potential (e.g., in hydrogen the nuclear attraction of the proton, in higher spherical atoms from nuclear attraction and the mean field of the other electrons (Fock potential)). But this has no influence on the angular part. E.g., 2p and 3p orbitals have the same angular part, not only in a single atom, but across all atoms (in the nonrelativistic case etc.).
     
  6. Feb 14, 2012 #5
    yes, but when drawing the 2p orbital and the 2p spherical harmonic what's the difference? THEY ARE THE SAME!
     
  7. Feb 14, 2012 #6
    If they are the same, then by the property of sharing the same identity they are not different.
     
  8. Feb 16, 2012 #7
    Note that multiplying the radial wave function by constant factor changes the size, not the shape, of the "drawing" of the orbital, which is really just a drawing of the surface of maximum probability density. By looking at how more general changes in the radial wave function affects this surface, you can see why spherical harmonics look so much like these surfaces.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Spherical harmonics and wavefunctions
Loading...