Spherically arranged polarization

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sang-Hyeon Han
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
AI Thread Summary
Arranging polarization spherically can yield a uniformly charged sphere of radius R, where the polarization vector \vec{P}(\vec{r}) can be determined by solving the divergence equation in spherical coordinates. The equation -∇·P = ρ_p indicates that the polarization creates an electrically neutral system, with surface polarization charge density σ_p neutralizing any positive charge density ρ_p in the interior. The derived expression for P_r(r) is -(ρ_p/3)r, leading to σ_p = -(ρ_p/3)R at the surface. Integrating the charge densities confirms that the surface charge precisely neutralizes the interior charge. This analysis demonstrates the relationship between spherical polarization and uniform charge distribution.
Sang-Hyeon Han
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
If we arrange the polarization spherically, Does it make a uniformly charged sphere radius of R?? If right, How can I find out \vec{P}(\vec{r}) which results in the constant charge density \rho?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Sang-Hyeon Han said:
If we arrange the polarization spherically, Does it make a uniformly charged sphere radius of R?? If right, How can I find out \vec{P}(\vec{r}) which results in the constant charge density \rho?
You can solve the divergence equation in spherical coordinates to produce a ## \rho_p ## that is constant everywhere, where ## -\nabla \cdot P=\rho_p ##, but polarization still creates an electrically neutral system, so that the surface polarization charge density of ## \sigma_p=P \cdot \hat{n} ## will be such that it neutralizes any positive ## \rho_p ## in the interior. Solving the divergence equation, you get ## P_r(r)=-(\rho_p/3)r ##. ## \\ ## ## \int \rho_p dv=+(4/3) \pi R^3 \rho_p. ## ## \\ ## Now ## P_r=-(\rho_p/3)R ## at ## r=R ##, so that ## \sigma_p=-(\rho_p/3)R ##. ## \\ ## ## \int \sigma_p dA=-(\rho_p/3)R(4 \pi R^2) ## precisely neutralizing ## \int \rho_p dv ##.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
You can solve the divergence equation in spherical coordinates to produce a ## \rho_p ## that is constant everywhere, where ## -\nabla \cdot P=\rho_p ##, but polarization still creates an electrically neutral system, so that the surface polarization charge density of ## \sigma_p=P \cdot \hat{n} ## will be such that it neutralizes any positive ## \rho_p ## in the interior. Solving the divergence equation, you get ## P_r(r)=-(\rho_p/3)r ##. ## \\ ## ## \int \rho_p dv=+(4/3) \pi R^3 \rho_p. ## ## \\ ## Now ## P_r=-(\rho_p/3)R ## at ## r=R ##, so that ## \sigma_p=-(\rho_p/3)R ##. ## \\ ## ## \int \sigma_p dA=-(\rho_p/3)R(4 \pi R^2) ## precisely neutralizing ## \int \rho_p dv ##.
very thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top